BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17998277)

  • 1. Handling nonresponse in surveys: analytic corrections compared with converting nonresponders.
    Jenkins P; Earle-Richardson G; Burdick P; May J
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 167(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17998277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonresponse error in injury-risk surveys.
    Johnson TP; Holbrook AL; Ik Cho Y; Bossarte RM
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 17046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of coverage rates and bias using double sampling methodology.
    Jenkins P; Scheim C; Wang JT; Reed R; Green A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 57(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15125621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
    Little RJ; Vartivarian S
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 12704617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geographic Information System mapping as a tool to assess nonresponse bias in survey research.
    Hansen RA; Henley AC; Brouwer ES; Oraefo AN; Roth MT
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Sep; 3(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 17945157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey research methods in evaluation and case-control studies.
    Kalton G; Piesse A
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1675-87. PubMed ID: 17278183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population coverage and nonresponse bias in a large-scale human exposure study.
    Mosquin P; Whitmore R; Suerken C; Quackenboss J
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 15674317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies of nonresponse and measurement error in the national household survey on drug abuse.
    Gfroerer J; Lessler J; Parsley T
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 167():273-95. PubMed ID: 9243566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do public health surveys provide representative data? Comparison of three different sampling approaches in the adult population of Croatia.
    Kolcić I; Polasek O
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Apr; 33 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19563162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population inferences from targeted sampling with uncertain epidemiologic information.
    Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):25-33. PubMed ID: 19200614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating assumptions of weighting class methods for partial response using a selection model.
    Smith PJ; Marsh LC
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4569-80. PubMed ID: 18613216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Given the increasing bias in random digit dial sampling, could respondent-driven sampling be a practical alternative?
    Lee R; Ranaldi J; Cummings M; Crucetti JB; Stratton H; McNutt LA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21376274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Census and geographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Shen M; Cozen W; Huang L; Colt J; De Roos AJ; Severson RK; Cerhan JR; Bernstein L; Morton LM; Pickle L; Ward MH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 167(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 17989060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small area random effects models for capture/recapture methods with applications to estimating coverage error in the U.S. Decennial Census.
    Malec D; Maples J
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(20):4038-56. PubMed ID: 18384183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression modeling of combined data from multiple sample surveys.
    Li L; Levy PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2160-9. PubMed ID: 19462413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusting nonresponse bias at subdomain levels using multiple response phases.
    Oleson JJ; He CZ
    Biom J; 2008 Feb; 50(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 17849386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of feeder school selectivity on predicting academic success in an allied health professional program.
    Wheeler E; Arena R
    J Allied Health; 2009; 38(3):e79-83. PubMed ID: 19753418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-reported home environmental risk factors for childhood asthma: a cross-sectional study of children in Buffalo, New York.
    Lin S; Gomez MI; Hwang SA; Munsie JP; Fitzgerald EF
    J Asthma; 2008 May; 45(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 18446598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.