BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17998423)

  • 1. Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe.
    Svennersten-Sjaunja KM; Pettersson G
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(13 Suppl):37-46. PubMed ID: 17998423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems.
    Bruckmaier RM; Wellnitz O
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(13 Suppl):15-20. PubMed ID: 17709779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feeding patterns and performance of cows in controlled cow traffic in automatic milking systems.
    Melin M; Svennersten-Sjaunja K; Wiktorsson H
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(11):3913-22. PubMed ID: 16230697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cleaning duration and water temperature on oxytocin release and milk removal in an automatic milking system.
    Dzidic A; Macuhova J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4163-9. PubMed ID: 15545378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking.
    Hovinen M; Rasmussen MD; Pyörälä S
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3696-703. PubMed ID: 19620651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feeding behavior, milking behavior, and milk yields of cows milked in a parlor versus an automatic milking system.
    Wagner-Storch AM; Palmer RW
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1494-502. PubMed ID: 12741576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invited review: The impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cow management, behavior, health, and welfare.
    Jacobs JA; Siegford JM
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 May; 95(5):2227-47. PubMed ID: 22541453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of milk enzymes and electrolytes, plasma metabolites, and oxidative status in twin cows milked in an automatic milking system or twice daily in a conventional milking parlor.
    Abeni F; Terzano MG; Speroni M; Migliorati L; Capelletti M; Calza F; Bianchi L; Pirlo G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3372-84. PubMed ID: 18765596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Milk quality on Danish farms with automatic milking systems.
    Rasmussen MD; Bjerring M; Justesen P; Jepsen L
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Nov; 85(11):2869-78. PubMed ID: 12487454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of air intake on the concentration of free fatty acids and vacuum fluctuations during automatic milking.
    Rasmussen MD; Wiking L; Bjerring M; Larsen HC
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4596-605. PubMed ID: 17106091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between udder health and hygiene on farms with an automatic milking system.
    Dohmen W; Neijenhuis F; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Sep; 93(9):4019-33. PubMed ID: 20723676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress responses during milking; comparing conventional and automatic milking in primiparous dairy cows.
    Hopster H; Bruckmaier RM; Van der Werf JT; Korte SM; Macuhova J; Korte-Bouws G; van Reenen CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3206-16. PubMed ID: 12512594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking.
    Ferneborg S; Svennersten-Sjaunja K
    J Dairy Res; 2015 Nov; 82(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 26411595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual detection of technical success and effectiveness of teat cleaning in two automatic milking systems.
    Hovinen M; Aisla AM; Pyörälä S
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3354-62. PubMed ID: 16107426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Milk cortisol concentration in automatic milking systems compared with auto-tandem milking parlors.
    Gygax L; Neuffer I; Kaufmann C; Hauser R; Wechsler B
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3447-54. PubMed ID: 16899678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic milking and grazing--effects of location of drinking water on water intake, milk yield, and cow behavior.
    Spörndly E; Wredle E
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 May; 88(5):1711-22. PubMed ID: 15829663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supplementary feeding at milking and minimum milking interval effects on cow traffic and milking performance in a pasture-based automatic milking system.
    Jago JG; Davis KL; Copeman PJ; Ohnstad I; Woolford MM
    J Dairy Res; 2007 Nov; 74(4):492-9. PubMed ID: 17922936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of automatic milking systems on milk yield in a hot environment.
    Speroni M; Pirlo G; Lolli S
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4687-93. PubMed ID: 17106101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management systems with extended milking intervals in ruminants: regulation of production and quality of milk.
    Marnet PG; Komara M
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(13 Suppl):47-56. PubMed ID: 17998424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study.
    Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Bava L; Zucali M
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17297090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.