BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17999298)

  • 1. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: East Kent experience.
    Nair MS; Bhandari HM; Nordin AJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 17999298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anglian Genitourinary Medicine Audit Group -- cervical cytology screening in HIV-positive women.
    Harry TC
    Int J STD AIDS; 2009 Jan; 20(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 19103897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
    van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
    Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
    Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer incidence and screening: status report on women in the United States.
    Martin LM; Parker SL; Wingo PA; Heath CW
    Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 8826141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
    Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rational care or rationing care? The case of cervical screening across the United Kingdom.
    Flynn H; Lewis P
    Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 23910733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
    Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
    Lynge E; Poll P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening history of women with invasive cervical cancer in north-east Italy.
    Zucchetto A; Franceschi S; Clagnan E; Serraino D; Zanier L; Franzo A;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Oct; 152(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 20667643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No increased risk for cervical cancer after a broader definition of a negative Pap smear.
    Rebolj M; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade F; Looman C; Boer R; Habbema JD
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 123(11):2632-5. PubMed ID: 18767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screen-detected invasive cervical carcinoma and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening.
    Herbert A; Anshu ; Gregory M; Gupta SS; Singh N
    BJOG; 2009 May; 116(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 19371308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
    Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire.
    Paterson ME; Peel KR; Joslin CA
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):896-8. PubMed ID: 6434133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer. What can you expect?
    Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Eklund G; Fox CH
    JAMA; 1984 Sep; 252(11):1423-6. PubMed ID: 6471269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
    Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
    N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.