These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17999573)

  • 1. On the regulation of cognitive control: action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks.
    Jostmann NB; Koole SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):593-609. PubMed ID: 17999573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit emotion regulation under demanding conditions: the moderating role of action versus state orientation.
    Koole SL; Fockenberg DA
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Apr; 25(3):440-52. PubMed ID: 21432685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the waxing and waning of working memory: action orientation moderates the impact of demanding relationship primes on working memory capacity.
    Jostmann NB; Koole SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1716-28. PubMed ID: 17122182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility.
    Terhune DB; Cardeña E; Lindgren M
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 21147539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of performance and state orientation on achievement and attention indicators in a simple stimulus-response task with and without performance feedback].
    Schweflinghaus W; Kiesswetter E; Schmidt KH; Rutenfranz J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1989; 36(4):634-53. PubMed ID: 2629362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Action-oriented versus state-oriented reactions to experimenter-induced failures].
    Brunstein JC
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1989; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 2588697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Free recall of everyday retrospective and prospective memories: the intention-superiority effect is moderated by action versus state orientation and by gender.
    Penningroth SL
    Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):711-24. PubMed ID: 16191821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attachment-related strategies during thought suppression: ironic rebounds and vulnerable self-representations.
    Mikulincer M; Dolev T; Shaver PR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Dec; 87(6):940-56. PubMed ID: 15598116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional Stroop via Internet among individuals with eating disorders.
    Johansson L; Carlbring P; Ghaderi A; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18190404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions.
    Koch S; Holland RW; van Knippenberg A
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 18835601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference.
    Protopapas A; Archonti A; Skaloumbakas C
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 May; 54(3):251-82. PubMed ID: 16962090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action.
    van Schie HT; van Waterschoot BM; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1493-500. PubMed ID: 19045988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive control explored by linear modelling behaviour and fMRI data during Stroop tasks.
    Liu J; Bai J; Zhang D
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):703-10. PubMed ID: 18560059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.
    Xiao X; Qiu J; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(7):674-8. PubMed ID: 19349920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from single task interference paradigms.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Aug; 55(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 17083928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.
    Badzakova-Trajkov G; Barnett KJ; Waldie KE; Kirk IJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():139-48. PubMed ID: 19084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials.
    Klapp ST
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1366-76. PubMed ID: 18085949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hemodynamics of cognitive control: the level of concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin in the superior prefrontal cortex varies as a function of performance in a modified Stroop task.
    León-Carrion J; Damas-López J; Martín-Rodríguez JF; Domínguez-Roldán JM; Murillo-Cabezas F; Barroso Y Martin JM; Domínguez-Morales MR
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18606191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.