194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18001785)
21. Validation of a high fidelity adult ureteroscopy and renoscopy simulator.
White MA; Dehaan AP; Stephens DD; Maes AA; Maatman TJ
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):673-7. PubMed ID: 20022047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The virtual reality transurethral prostatic resection trainer: evaluation of discriminate validity.
Rashid HH; Kowalewski T; Oppenheimer P; Ooms A; Krieger JN; Sweet RM
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2283-6. PubMed ID: 17509340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual reality flexible cystoscopy: a validation study.
Shah J; Darzi A
BJU Int; 2002 Dec; 90(9):828-32. PubMed ID: 12460340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment.
Haycock AV; Bassett P; Bladen J; Thomas-Gibson S
Endoscopy; 2009 Nov; 41(11):952-8. PubMed ID: 19802776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The current role of medical simulation in american urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors.
Le CQ; Lightner DJ; VanderLei L; Segura JW; Gettman MT
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):288-91. PubMed ID: 17162066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure.
Lucas SM; Zeltser IS; Bensalah K; Tuncel A; Jenkins A; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2588-91; discussion 2591. PubMed ID: 18950817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills.
McDougall EM; Kolla SB; Santos RT; Gan JM; Box GN; Louie MK; Gamboa AJ; Kaplan AG; Moskowitz RM; Andrade LA; Skarecky DW; Osann KE; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19616797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A new computer enhanced visual learning method to train urology residents in pediatric orchiopexy: a prototype for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education documentation.
Maizels M; Yerkes EB; Macejko A; Hagerty J; Chaviano AH; Cheng EY; Liu D; Sarwark JP; Corcoran JF; Meyer T; Kaplan WE
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1814-8; discussion 1818. PubMed ID: 18721933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of previously acquired skills on sinus surgery simulator performance.
Glaser AY; Hall CB; Uribe SJ; Fried MP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 16213923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intelligent dental training simulator with objective skill assessment and feedback.
Rhienmora P; Haddawy P; Suebnukarn S; Dailey MN
Artif Intell Med; 2011 Jun; 52(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 21641781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hybrid augmented reality simulator: preliminary construct validation of laparoscopic smoothness in a urology residency program.
Feifer A; Delisle J; Anidjar M
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18710760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ureteroscopy and cystoscopy training: comparison between transparent and non-transparent simulators.
Hu WG; Feng JY; Wang J; Song YJ; Xu XT; Zhou H; Huang CB
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 15():93. PubMed ID: 26032174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The compactEASIE is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: a prospective randomised trial.
Maiss J; Millermann L; Heinemann K; Naegel A; Peters A; Matthes K; Hahn EG; Hochberger J
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Jan; 39(1):70-8; discussion 79-80. PubMed ID: 16942923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Training and evaluating spinal surgeons: the development of novel performance measures.
Woodrow SI; Dubrowski A; Khokhotva M; Backstein D; Rampersaud YR; Massicotte EM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2921-5. PubMed ID: 18246019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acquisition of basic fiberoptic intubation skills with a virtual reality airway simulator.
Goldmann K; Steinfeldt T
J Clin Anesth; 2006 May; 18(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16731318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Virtual reality simulation in acquiring and differentiating basic ophthalmic microsurgical skills.
Solverson DJ; Mazzoli RA; Raymond WR; Nelson ML; Hansen EA; Torres MF; Bhandari A; Hartranft CD
Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 19444047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Process and outcome measures of expert/novice performance on a haptic virtual reality system.
Suebnukarn S; Phatthanasathiankul N; Sombatweroje S; Rhienmora P; Haddawy P
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):658-65. PubMed ID: 19481326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of a flexible cystoscopy course.
Shah J; Montgomery B; Langley S; Darzi A
BJU Int; 2002 Dec; 90(9):833-5. PubMed ID: 12460341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
