These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18002082)

  • 1. Level set-based core segmentation of mammographic masses facilitating three stage (core, periphery, spiculation) analysis.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():819-24. PubMed ID: 18002082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital mammogram spiculated mass detection and spicule segmentation using level sets.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4979-84. PubMed ID: 18003124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
    Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammographic computer aided diagnosis (CAD) using adaptive level set segmentation.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4973-8. PubMed ID: 18003123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
    Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
    Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-aided diagnosis.
    Leichter I; Fields S; Nirel R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Lederman R; Buchbinder S
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10663772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier.
    Delogu P; Evelina Fantacci M; Kasae P; Retico A
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1479-91. PubMed ID: 17383623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a New Ensemble Learning Framework for Mass Classification in Mammograms.
    Rahmani Seryasat O; Haddadnia J
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e407-e420. PubMed ID: 29141776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multilevel learning-based segmentation of ill-defined and spiculated masses in mammograms.
    Tao Y; Lo SC; Freedman MT; Makariou E; Xuan J
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5993-6002. PubMed ID: 21158311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Gurcan M
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Bick U; Lu P; Wolverton DE; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1569-79. PubMed ID: 8551981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
    Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.