122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18002153)
1. A computational model of rat cerebral blood flow using non-uniform rational B-splines.
Pushkin SV; Podoprigora GI; Comas L; Boulahdour H; Cardot JC; Baud M; Nartsissov YR; Blagosklonov O
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1098-100. PubMed ID: 18002153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cerebral arterial inflow assessment with 18F-FDG PET: methodology and feasibility.
Benathan-Tordjmann J; Bailly P; Meyer ME; Daouk J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25015567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDG-PET parametric imaging by total variation minimization.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K; Reiman E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 19261438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shortened acquisition protocols for the quantitative assessment of the 2-tissue-compartment model using dynamic PET/CT 18F-FDG studies.
Strauss LG; Pan L; Cheng C; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 21321263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative cerebral blood flow with bolus tracking perfusion MRI: measurements in porcine model and comparison with H(2)(15)O PET.
Kellner E; Mix M; Reisert M; Förster K; Nguyen-Thanh T; Splitthoff DN; Gall P; Kiselev VG; Mader I
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1723-34. PubMed ID: 24375612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. (18)F-FDG PET and vascular inflammation: time to refine the paradigm?
Sadeghi MM
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 22(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 24925623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Extraction of a plasma time-activity curve from dynamic brain PET images based on independent component analysis.
Naganawa M; Kimura Y; Ishii K; Oda K; Ishiwata K; Matani A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 15709657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shortened dynamic (18)F-FDG PET.
Disselhorst JA; Vriens D; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2011 Aug; 52(8):1330; author reply 1330-1. PubMed ID: 21764799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification in positron emission tomography for research in pharmacology and drug development.
Cunningham VJ; Gunn RN; Matthews JC
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jul; 25(7):643-6. PubMed ID: 15208489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the input function non-invasively for FDG-PET quantification with multiple linear regression analysis: simulation and verification with in vivo data.
Fang YH; Kao T; Liu RS; Wu LC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 May; 31(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 14740178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of the image-derived carotid artery input function using independent component analysis for the quantitation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images.
Chen K; Chen X; Renaut R; Alexander GE; Bandy D; Guo H; Reiman EM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7055-71. PubMed ID: 18029993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplified quantification of small animal [18F]FDG PET studies using a standard arterial input function.
Meyer PT; Circiumaru V; Cardi CA; Thomas DH; Bal H; Acton PD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Aug; 33(8):948-54. PubMed ID: 16699768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive quantification of cerebral blood flow for rats by microPET imaging of 15O labelled water: the application of a cardiac time-activity curve for the tracer arterial input function.
Yee SH; Jerabek PA; Fox PT
Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Oct; 26(10):903-11. PubMed ID: 16160650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood flow-metabolic relationships are dependent on tumour size in non-small cell lung cancer: a study using quantitative contrast-enhanced computer tomography and positron emission tomography.
Miles KA; Griffiths MR; Keith CJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Jan; 33(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 16180030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification in clinical fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Hallett WA
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jul; 25(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 15208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creation and application of a simulated database of dynamic [18f]MPPF PET acquisitions incorporating inter-individual anatomical and biological variability.
Reilhac A; Evans AC; Gimenez G; Costes N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1431-9. PubMed ID: 17117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification method in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose brain positron emission tomography using independent component analysis.
Su KH; Wu LC; Liu RS; Wang SJ; Chen JC
Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Nov; 26(11):995-1004. PubMed ID: 16208178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of global cerebral blood flow measured by phase-contrast mapping MRI with
Vestergaard MB; Lindberg U; Aachmann-Andersen NJ; Lisbjerg K; Christensen SJ; Rasmussen P; Olsen NV; Law I; Larsson HB; Henriksen OM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):692-699. PubMed ID: 27619317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
