157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18002210)
1. Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound.
Sinha SP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Nees AV; Goodsitt MM; LeCarpentier GL; Fowlkes JB; Chalek CL; Carson PL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1335-8. PubMed ID: 18002210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated ultrasound scanning on a dual-modality breast imaging system: coverage and motion issues and solutions.
Sinha SP; Goodsitt MM; Roubidoux MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Lashbrook CR; Thomenius KE; Chalek CL; Carson PL
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 May; 26(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 17460006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fusion of vibro-acoustography images and X-ray mammography.
GholamHosseini H; Alizad A; Fatemi M
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2803-6. PubMed ID: 17946531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Schaefgen B; Heil J; Barr RG; Radicke M; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Hennigs A; von Au A; Spratte J; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 29302784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration.
Hopp T; Duric N; Ruiter NV
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():170-81. PubMed ID: 25456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 23116728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deformable mapping using biomechanical models to relate corresponding lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Roubidoux MA; Brock KK; Davis CL; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Image Anal; 2020 Feb; 60():101599. PubMed ID: 31760192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chestwall segmentation in 3D breast ultrasound using a deformable volume model.
Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():245-56. PubMed ID: 17633704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mono- and multimodal registration of optical breast images.
Pearlman PC; Adams A; Elias SG; Mali WP; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Aug; 17(8):080901-1. PubMed ID: 23224161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-modal registration based ultrasound mosaicing.
Kutter O; Wein W; Navab N
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):763-70. PubMed ID: 20426057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First clinical use of a standardized three-dimensional ultrasound for breast imaging.
Kotsianos-Hermle D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky KM; Reiser M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 18479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.
Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
