These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18002278)

  • 1. Volume mesh generation and finite element analysis of trabecular bone magnetic resonance images.
    Alberich-Bayarri A; Moratal D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Salmerón-Sánchez M; Vallés-Lluch A; Nieto-Charques L; Rieta JJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1603-6. PubMed ID: 18002278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical simulation of wave propagation in cancellous bone.
    Padilla F; Bossy E; Haiat G; Jenson F; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e239-43. PubMed ID: 16859723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ex vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure from three-dimensional projection reconstruction MR micro-images.
    Accardo A; Candido G; Jellús V; Toffanin R; Vittur F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):967-77. PubMed ID: 12892324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital image analysis of trabecular microstructure].
    Gu D; Chen Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1154-7. PubMed ID: 19947510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trabecular bone structure analysis in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI.
    Magland JF; Wehrli FW
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1482-93. PubMed ID: 19000865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wavelet-based characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from magnetic resonance images at 3 T compared with micro-computed tomographic measurements.
    Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Burghardt AJ; Haase S; Sedat JW; Moss WC; Majumdar S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 17371730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A three-dimensional digital image correlation technique for strain measurements in microstructures.
    Verhulp E; van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1313-20. PubMed ID: 15275838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.
    Li CQ; Magland JF; Rajapakse CS; Guo XE; Zhang XH; Vasilic B; Wehrli FW
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5584-94. PubMed ID: 19175116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local plate/rod descriptors of 3D trabecular bone micro-CT images from medial axis topologic analysis.
    Peyrin F; Attali D; Chappard C; Benhamou CL
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4364-76. PubMed ID: 20879596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonic pulse waves in cancellous bone analyzed by finite-difference time-domain methods.
    Hosokawa A
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e227-31. PubMed ID: 16844171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical simulation of the dependence of quantitative ultrasonic parameters on trabecular bone microarchitecture and elastic constants.
    Haïat G; Padilla F; Barkmann R; Gluer CC; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e289-94. PubMed ID: 16859726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation between the SOS in trabecular bone and stiffness and density studied by finite-element analysis.
    Goossens L; Vanderoost J; Jaecques S; Boonen S; D'hooge J; Lauriks W; Van der Perre G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1234-42. PubMed ID: 18599411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the linear finite element prediction of deformation and strain of human cancellous bone to 3D digital volume correlation measurements.
    Zauel R; Yeni YN; Bay BK; Dong XN; Fyhrie DP
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16532610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of trabecular bone thickness in the limited resolution regime of in vivo MRI by fuzzy distance transform.
    Saha PK; Wehrli FW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jan; 23(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 14719687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational elastography from standard ultrasound image sequences by global trust region optimization.
    Kybic J; Smutek D
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():299-310. PubMed ID: 17354704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating structural properties of trabecular bone from gray-level low-resolution images.
    Tabor Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 16510304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micro-finite-element method to assess elastic properties of trabecular bone at micro- and macroscopic level.
    Rieger R; Auregan JC; Hoc T
    Morphologie; 2018 Mar; 102(336):12-20. PubMed ID: 28893491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generic 3-dimensional system to mimic trabecular bone surface adaptation.
    Nowak M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Oct; 9(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 17132617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite-element-based photoacoustic tomography: reconstruction algorithm and simulations.
    Yuan Z; Jiang H
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):538-46. PubMed ID: 17388171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.