These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18002456)
1. Personal, non-invasive dosimetry for radio-frequency human exposure assessment. Iskra S; McKenzie R; Cosic I Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2319-22. PubMed ID: 18002456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of active personal dosemeters as a personal monitoring device: comparison with TL dosimetry. Boziari A; Koukorava C; Carinou E; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):173-6. PubMed ID: 21196464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intercomparison on measurements of the quantity personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in photon fields in the African region. Msimang Z; Cruz-Suárez R; Zeger J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):282-6. PubMed ID: 21112891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental procedures and statistical results for evaluation of exposure to a radiofrequency electromagnetic field with complex analogue modulation. Trinchero S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; Trinchero D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 15550715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occupational radiation exposure during removal of radioactive reactor components from GRR-1 pool. Kontogeorgakos D; Tzika F; Valakis S; Stamatelatos IE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):632-5. PubMed ID: 21051436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective dose measurement at workplaces within an instrumented anthropomorphic phantom. Villagrasa C; Darréon J; Martin-Burtat N; Clairand I; Colin J; Fontbonne JM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):640-4. PubMed ID: 21051438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of aperture efficiency of a radiofrequency electric field strength meter antenna. Sachdev RN; Swarup G; Rajan KK; Joseph L Health Phys; 1997 Feb; 72(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 9003720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of counting efficiencies of a whole-body counter using Monte Carlo simulation with voxel phantoms. Takahashi M; Kinase S; Kramer R Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):407-10. PubMed ID: 21131662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Principles for the design and calibration of radiation protection dosemeters for operational and protection quantities for eye lens dosimetry. Bordy JM; Gualdrini G; Daures J; Mariotti F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):257-61. PubMed ID: 21362692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: implications for exposure assessment. Inyang I; Benke G; McKenzie R; Abramson M J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 17327852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eye lens dosimetry: task 2 within the ORAMED project. Gualdrini G; Mariotti F; Wach S; Bilski P; Denoziere M; Daures J; Bordy JM; Ferrari P; Monteventi F; Fantuzzi E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):473-7. PubMed ID: 21335629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and radiation. Cooper TG; Allen SG; Blackwell RP; Litchfield I; Mann SM; Pope JM; van Tongeren MJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 15266067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency calibration of a whole-body-counting measurement setup using a modular physical phantom. Lebacq AL; Bruggeman M; Vanhavere F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):411-4. PubMed ID: 21216733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recalibration of indium foil for personnel screening in criticality accidents. Takada C; Tsujimura N; Mikami S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):575-9. PubMed ID: 21062798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure measuring techniques for wide band mobile radiocommunications. Trinchero S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; d'Amore G; Trinchero D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 15550716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Survey and analysis of radiation safety management systems at medical institutions--second report: radiation measurement, calibration of radiation survey meters, and periodic check of installations, equipment, and protection instruments]. Ohba H; Ogasawara K; Aburano T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jan; 62(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16456509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainties in doses from intakes of radionuclides assessed from monitoring measurements. Etherington G; Birchall A; Puncher M; Molokanov A; Blanchardon E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 17135426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98-2450 MHz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements. Gryz K; Zradziński P; Karpowicz J Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():272460. PubMed ID: 25879021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency selective solutions for an efficient non-ionising radiation protection in the radiofrequency and microwave ranges. Stefanelli R; Trinchero D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):231-5. PubMed ID: 19914967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intersubject local SAR variation for 7T prostate MR imaging with an eight-channel single-side adapted dipole antenna array. Ipek O; Raaijmakers AJ; Lagendijk JJ; Luijten PR; van den Berg CA Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1559-67. PubMed ID: 23754584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]