These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1800294)

  • 1. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].
    Liu J; Wang X; Zhang R; Bao YH; Gu KF; Pan LP
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 42(8):589-593. PubMed ID: 39223044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation performance of four hearing protectors under dynamic movement and different user fitting conditions.
    Casali JG; Park MY
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 2376410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs.
    Tsukada T; Sakakibara H
    Ind Health; 2008 Aug; 46(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 18716388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
    Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field attenuation characteristics of hearing protectors and differences in estimating their attenuation with different methods.
    Gong W; Xu Y; Liu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):3979. PubMed ID: 35778180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.
    Samelli AG; Gomes RF; Chammas TV; Silva BG; Moreira RR; Fiorini AC
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):112-119. PubMed ID: 29785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.