These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18003114)
1. Modeling and detecting deep brain activity with MEG & EEG. Attal Y; Bhattacharjee M; Yelnik J; Cottereau B; Lefèvre J; Okada Y; Bardinet E; Chupin M; Baillet S Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4937-40. PubMed ID: 18003114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study. Attal Y; Schwartz D PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59856. PubMed ID: 23527277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony. David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head models and dynamic causal modeling of subcortical activity using magnetoencephalographic/electroencephalographic data. Attal Y; Maess B; Friederici A; David O Rev Neurosci; 2012; 23(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 22718615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG/MEG source imaging of deep brain activity within the maximum entropy on the mean framework: Simulations and validation in epilepsy. Afnan J; Cai Z; Lina JM; Abdallah C; Delaire E; Avigdor T; Ros V; Hedrich T; von Ellenrieder N; Kobayashi E; Frauscher B; Gotman J; Grova C Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jul; 45(10):e26720. PubMed ID: 38994740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG. Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging. Ding L; Yuan H Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):775-95. PubMed ID: 22102512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors. Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources. Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data. Neymotin SA; Daniels DS; Caldwell B; McDougal RA; Carnevale NT; Jas M; Moore CI; Hines ML; Hämäläinen M; Jones SR Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31967544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sparsity enables estimation of both subcortical and cortical activity from MEG and EEG. Krishnaswamy P; Obregon-Henao G; Ahveninen J; Khan S; Babadi B; Iglesias JE; Hämäläinen MS; Purdon PL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):E10465-E10474. PubMed ID: 29138310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-Modal Electrophysiological Source Imaging With Attention Neural Networks Based on Deep Fusion of EEG and MEG. Jiao M; Yang S; Xian X; Fotedar N; Liu F IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():2492-2502. PubMed ID: 38976470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study. Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum? Andersen LM; Jerbi K; Dalal SS Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116817. PubMed ID: 32278092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth. Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals. Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source models of sleep spindles using MEG and EEG measurements. Yoshida H; Iramina K; Ueno S Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 8728423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information. Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]