These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18003867)

  • 1. Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 18003867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Danielsson H; Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.
    Kaiser AR; Kirk KI; Lachs L; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 46(2):390-404. PubMed ID: 14700380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.
    Atcherson SR; Mendel LL; Baltimore WJ; Patro C; Lee S; Pousson M; Spann MJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28054912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.
    Simon HJ; Levitt H
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):259-72. PubMed ID: 18003869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French.
    Benoît C; Mohamadi T; Kandel S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1195-203. PubMed ID: 7823561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction of audition and vision for the perception of prosodic contrastive focus.
    Dohen M; Loevenbruck H
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):177-206. PubMed ID: 19624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.