330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18003871)
1. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Xin Luo ; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 18003871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Musical and vocal emotion perception for cochlear implants users.
Paquette S; Ahmed GD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Peretz I; Lehmann A
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():272-282. PubMed ID: 30181063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.
Barrett KC; Chatterjee M; Caldwell MT; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Kulkarni AM; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1372-1382. PubMed ID: 32149924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Talker variability effects on vocal emotion recognition in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.
Luo X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):EL497. PubMed ID: 28040001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.
Damm SA; Sis JL; Kulkarni AM; Chatterjee M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3728-3740. PubMed ID: 31589545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1711-8. PubMed ID: 16240829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal-Hearing Listeners' and Cochlear Implant Users' Perception of Pitch Cues in Emotional Speech.
Gilbers S; Fuller C; Gilbers D; Broersma M; Goudbeek M; Free R; Başkent D
Iperception; 2015 Oct; 6(5):0301006615599139. PubMed ID: 27648210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
