These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18004905)
1. Putting the plaster on the table. Isaacson RJ Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1132-3. PubMed ID: 18004905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Criteria for evaluation of orthodontic treatment]. Mauchamp OP Inf Dent; 1979 Mar; 61(12):983-92. PubMed ID: 286679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Limits in orthodontics. (Evaluation after a time lapse of 7 and one half to 10 and one half years of orthodontic treatment in 4 cases of class 3 malocclusion)]. Riccioli GA Mondo Odontostomatol; 1971; 13(6):975-86. PubMed ID: 5290760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Late results of treatment for overbite]. Sterzik G Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1977; 65(5):499-514. PubMed ID: 143837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Grading your orthodontic treatment results. Gottlieb EL J Clin Orthod; 1975 Mar; 9(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 1054698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A method for obtaining photographic documentation of plaster models]. Komorowska A Protet Stomatol; 1978; 28(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 293782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Logistics in digital orthodontic models. Lemay M Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 18220006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment outcomes in 4 modes of orthodontic practice. Poulton D; Vlaskalic V; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 15775950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System. Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Jamieson SA Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18302453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Mayers M; Firestone AR; Rashid R; Vig KW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16214623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified plaster of paris for constructing prosthetic and orthodontic models. Sanad ME Egypt Dent J; 1980 Jan; 26(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 7035130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Rheude B; Sadowsky PL; Ferriera A; Jacobson A Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 15898364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]