These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18004993)
1. Origin bias of test items compromises the validity and fairness of curriculum comparisons. Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP Med Educ; 2007 Dec; 41(12):1217-23. PubMed ID: 18004993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test. Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; Thoben AJ; van der Vleuten CP Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 18181848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17479352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The versatility of progress testing assessed in an international context: a start for benchmarking global standardization? Verhoeven BH; Snellen-Balendong HA; Hay IT; Boon JM; van der Linde MJ; Blitz-Lindeque JJ; Hoogenboom RJ; Verwijnen GM; Wijnen WH; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP Med Teach; 2005 Sep; 27(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 16199358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students. Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking development of clinical reasoning ability across five medical schools using a progress test. Williams RG; Klamen DL; White CB; Petrusa E; Fincher RM; Whitfield CF; Shatzer JH; McCarty T; Miller BM Acad Med; 2011 Sep; 86(9):1148-54. PubMed ID: 21785314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking progress tests for cross-institutional comparisons: every road makes a difference and all of them have bumps. Albanese M Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 18181841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Prince KJ; Scherpbier AJ; van Mameren H; Drukker J; van der Vleuten CP Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15733169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in cancer prevention knowledge and experience among medical students at three institutions over time. Lee M; Wilkereson L; Harrity S; Hodgson CS J Cancer Educ; 2006; 21(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 17542714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences within medical schools for students with poor performance on a medical school standardized patient comprehensive assessment. Hauer KE; Teherani A; Kerr KM; Irby DM; O'Sullivan PS Acad Med; 2009 May; 84(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 19704205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Hojat M; Mangione S; Nasca TJ; Rattner S; Erdmann JB; Gonnella JS; Magee M Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):934-41. PubMed ID: 15327674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive assessment of medical schools in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Simunović VJ; Sonntag HG; Hren D; Dørup J; Krivokuća Z; Bokonjić D; Verhaaren H; Horsch A; Mimica M; Vojniković B; Selesković H; Marz R; Marusić A; Marusić M Med Educ; 2006 Dec; 40(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 17118109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential student attrition and differential exposure mask effects of problem-based learning in curriculum comparison studies. Schmidt HG; Muijtjens AM; Van der Vleuten CP; Norman GR Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):463-75. PubMed ID: 22361797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross institutional collaboration in assessment: a case on progress testing. van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM; Thoben AJ; Cohen-Schotanus J; van Boven CP Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):719-25. PubMed ID: 15763876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical skills training in a skills lab compared with skills training in internships: comparison of skills development curricula. Peeraer G; Scherpbier AJ; Remmen R; De winter BY; Hendrickx K; van Petegem P; Weyler J; Bossaert L Educ Health (Abingdon); 2007 Nov; 20(3):125. PubMed ID: 18080964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A new, problem oriented medicine curriculum in Utrecht: less basic science knowledge]. Keijsers CJ; Custers EJ; ten Cate OT Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():B400. PubMed ID: 19785897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a clinical attachment in Primary Health Care as a component of undergraduate medical education. Mariolis A; Mihas C; Alevizos A; Papathanasiou M; Mariolis-Sapsakos T; Marayiannis K; Koutsilieris M Med Teach; 2008; 30(7):e202-7. PubMed ID: 18777420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability (generalizability) of the Maastricht Skills Test. van der Vleuten CP; van Luyk SJ; Swanson DB Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():228-33. PubMed ID: 3218861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Back to the basic sciences: an innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Spencer AL; Brosenitsch T; Levine AS; Kanter SL Acad Med; 2008 Jul; 83(7):662-9. PubMed ID: 18580085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel Medical Achievement Self-efficacy Scale (MASS): a valid and reliable tool. Turan S; Valcke M; De Maeseneer J; Aper L; Koole S; De Wispelaere C; Deketelaere A; Derese A Med Teach; 2013 Jul; 35(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 23701248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]