These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18005157)

  • 1. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence.
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LM; Snyder RL; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18005157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.
    Sullivan-Beckers L; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3158-71. PubMed ID: 20624180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):602-10. PubMed ID: 25611556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trees to treehoppers: genetic variation in host plants contributes to variation in the mating signals of a plant-feeding insect.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Feb; 17(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24350855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
    Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Al-Wathiqui N
    Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):871-84. PubMed ID: 21695477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local population density and group composition influence the signal-preference relationship in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Fowler-Finn KD; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 27749022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jul; 280(1763):20130803. PubMed ID: 23698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory trade-offs predict signal divergence in Surfperch.
    Cummings ME
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):530-45. PubMed ID: 17348918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation.
    Arnegard ME; McIntyre PB; Harmon LJ; Zelditch ML; Crampton WG; Davis JK; Sullivan JP; Lavoué S; Hopkins CD
    Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):335-56. PubMed ID: 20653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.
    Danielson-François AM; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):532-42. PubMed ID: 16599929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid diversification of sexual signals in Hawaiian Nesosydne planthoppers (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): the relative role of neutral and selective forces.
    Goodman KR; Kelley JP; Welter SC; Roderick GK; Elias DO
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):415-27. PubMed ID: 25535672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks.
    Boughman JW
    Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6840):944-8. PubMed ID: 11418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.
    Rodríguez RL; Ramaswamy K; Cocroft RB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1601):2585-93. PubMed ID: 17002943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.
    Mills SC; Alatalo RV; Koskela E; Mappes J; Mappes T; Oksanen TA
    Evolution; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1748-57. PubMed ID: 17598753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.