236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18005336)
1. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 1: Characterization of adhesive wear and structure of retaining screws.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 18005336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 2: Metallurgical and microhardness analysis.
Al Jabbari Y; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino A
J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):181-91. PubMed ID: 18047489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 4: Failure analysis of 10 fractured retaining screws retrieved from three patients.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18205736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotribological behavior of two retrieved implant abutment screws after long-term use in vivo.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle RA; Zinelis S; Iacopino AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1474-80. PubMed ID: 23189299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of mechanical cycling and different misfit levels on Vicker's microhardness of retention screws for single implant-supported prostheses.
Assunção WG; Jorge JR; Dos Santos PH; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 21895835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of preload values in gold and titanium dental implant retaining screws.
Doolabh R; Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
SADJ; 2014 Aug; 69(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 26548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic complications in mandibular metal-resin implant-fixed complete dental prostheses: a 5- to 9-year analysis.
Purcell BA; McGlumphy EA; Holloway JA; Beck FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):847-57. PubMed ID: 19014154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
Schulte JK; Coffey J
Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
Duyck J; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of cast-to implant components from five manufacturers.
Ucar Y; Brantley WA; Bhattiprolu SN; Johnston WM; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 19782823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of repeated screw joint closing and opening cycles on implant prosthetic screw reverse torque and implant and screw thread morphology.
Guzaitis KL; Knoernschild KL; Viana MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 21889002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.
Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7615325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
