414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18005835)
1. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term maxillary changes in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with slow and rapid palatal expansion.
Lima Filho RM; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 18774084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changes.
Phan KL; Bendeus M; Hägg U; Hansen K; Rabie AB
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17142260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue profile after distal molar movement with a pendulum K-loop appliance versus cervical headgear.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Güngör-Acar A; Kircelli BH
Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18251595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment effects of bonded RME and vertical-pull chincup followed by fixed appliance in patients with increased vertical dimension.
Schulz SO; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 16168329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
