601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18005843)
1. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel brackets with different visible light curing times and directions.
Heravi F; Bayani S
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20043551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets.
Kitahara-Céia FM; Mucha JN; Marques dos Santos PA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 18929273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of an antioxidizing agent on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to bleached human enamel.
Bulut H; Turkun M; Kaya AD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 16473720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
Amditis C
Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Wahadni AM
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 17702799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro study of the effect of Pro Seal varnish on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
El Bokle D; Munir H
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18575308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of debonding force direction on orthodontic shear bond strength.
Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 16473719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
Al Shamsi AH; Cunningham JL; Lamey PJ; Lynch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):301.e9-15. PubMed ID: 17346580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
