57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18006554)
1. Genome-wide co-expression based prediction of differential expressions.
Lai Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 24(5):666-73. PubMed ID: 18006554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mixture model approach to the tests of concordance and discordance between two large-scale experiments with two-sample groups.
Lai Y; Adam BL; Podolsky R; She JX
Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 23(10):1243-50. PubMed ID: 17384018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-group cancer outlier differential gene expression detection.
Liu F; Wu B
Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Apr; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 17392030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating prior information via shrinkage: a combined analysis of genome-wide location data and gene expression data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Jeong KS; Khodursky A
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2258-75. PubMed ID: 16958153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new efficient statistical test for detecting variability in the gene expression data.
Mathur S; Dolo S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 17698928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using support vector regression to model the correlation between the clinical metastases time and gene expression profile for breast cancer.
Chiu SH; Chen CC; Lin TH
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Nov; 44(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 18678474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene expression trends and protein features effectively complement each other in gene function prediction.
Wabnik K; Hvidsten TR; Kedzierska A; Van Leene J; De Jaeger G; Beemster GT; Komorowski J; Kuiper MT
Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 19050035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An enhanced quantile approach for assessing differential gene expressions.
Wang H; He X
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 18325069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustified MANOVA with applications in detecting differentially expressed genes from oligonucleotide arrays.
Xu J; Cui X
Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1056-62. PubMed ID: 18316342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide expression studies of atherosclerosis: critical issues in methodology, analysis, interpretation of transcriptomics data.
Bijnens AP; Lutgens E; Ayoubi T; Kuiper J; Horrevoets AJ; Daemen MJ
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2006 Jun; 26(6):1226-35. PubMed ID: 16574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer outlier differential gene expression detection.
Wu B
Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):566-75. PubMed ID: 17021278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inference on the limiting false discovery rate and the p-value threshold parameter assuming weak dependence between gene expression levels within subject.
Heller G; Qin J
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article14. PubMed ID: 17542776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of colorectal cancer gene expression profiling studies identifies consistently reported candidate biomarkers.
Chan SK; Griffith OL; Tai IT; Jones SJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Mar; 17(3):543-52. PubMed ID: 18349271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneously detection of genomic and expression alterations in prostate cancer using cDNA microarray.
Jiang M; Li M; Fu X; Huang Y; Qian H; Sun R; Mao Y; Xie Y; Li Y
Prostate; 2008 Oct; 68(14):1496-509. PubMed ID: 18366025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Poisson approximation for significance in genome-wide ChIP-chip tiling arrays.
Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2825-31. PubMed ID: 18953047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The AtGenExpress hormone and chemical treatment data set: experimental design, data evaluation, model data analysis and data access.
Goda H; Sasaki E; Akiyama K; Maruyama-Nakashita A; Nakabayashi K; Li W; Ogawa M; Yamauchi Y; Preston J; Aoki K; Kiba T; Takatsuto S; Fujioka S; Asami T; Nakano T; Kato H; Mizuno T; Sakakibara H; Yamaguchi S; Nambara E; Kamiya Y; Takahashi H; Hirai MY; Sakurai T; Shinozaki K; Saito K; Yoshida S; Shimada Y
Plant J; 2008 Aug; 55(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 18419781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculating the statistical significance of changes in pathway activity from gene expression data.
Rahnenführer J; Domingues FS; Maydt J; Lengauer T
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article16. PubMed ID: 16646794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
