BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18006555)

  • 1. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient comprehensive search algorithm for tagSNP selection using linkage disequilibrium criteria.
    Qin ZS; Gopalakrishnan S; Abecasis GR
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 16269414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100 K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Di X; Matsuzaki H; Webster TA; Hubbell E; Liu G; Dong S; Bartell D; Huang J; Chiles R; Yang G; Shen MM; Kulp D; Kennedy GC; Mei R; Jones KW; Cawley S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1958-63. PubMed ID: 15657097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TAGster: efficient selection of LD tag SNPs in single or multiple populations.
    Xu Z; Kaplan NL; Taylor JA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3254-5. PubMed ID: 17827206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for genotyping errors in tagging SNP selection.
    Liu W; Yang T; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17346256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LdCompare: rapid computation of single- and multiple-marker r2 and genetic coverage.
    Hao K; Di X; Cawley S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 17148510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A greedier approach for finding tag SNPs.
    Chang CJ; Huang YT; Chao KM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 16403792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SNP mining porcine ESTs with MAVIANT, a novel tool for SNP evaluation and annotation.
    Panitz F; Stengaard H; Hornshøj H; Gorodkin J; Hedegaard J; Cirera S; Thomsen B; Madsen LB; Høj A; Vingborg RK; Zahn B; Wang X; Wang X; Wernersson R; Jørgensen CB; Scheibye-Knudsen K; Arvin T; Lumholdt S; Sawera M; Green T; Nielsen BJ; Havgaard JH; Brunak S; Fredholm M; Bendixen C
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i387-91. PubMed ID: 17646321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A whole genome long-range haplotype (WGLRH) test for detecting imprints of positive selection in human populations.
    Zhang C; Bailey DK; Awad T; Liu G; Xing G; Cao M; Valmeekam V; Retief J; Matsuzaki H; Taub M; Seielstad M; Kennedy GC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(17):2122-8. PubMed ID: 16845142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FastTagger: an efficient algorithm for genome-wide tag SNP selection using multi-marker linkage disequilibrium.
    Liu G; Wang Y; Wong L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():66. PubMed ID: 20113476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference of missing SNPs and information quantity measurements for haplotype blocks.
    Su SC; Kuo CC; Chen T
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):2001-7. PubMed ID: 15699029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fine mapping functional sites or regions from case-control data using haplotypes of multiple linked SNPs.
    Cheng R; Ma JZ; Elston RC; Li MD
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 69(Pt 1):102-12. PubMed ID: 15638831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of single SNPs, haplotypes, and whole-genome LD maps on accuracy of association mapping.
    Maniatis N; Collins A; Morton NE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 17285621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNP selection for association studies: maximizing power across SNP choice and study size.
    Pardi F; Lewis CM; Whittaker JC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Nov; 69(Pt 6):733-46. PubMed ID: 16266411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNP-VISTA: an interactive SNP visualization tool.
    Shah N; Teplitsky MV; Minovitsky S; Pennacchio LA; Hugenholtz P; Hamann B; Dubchak IL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():292. PubMed ID: 16336665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy assessment of SNP sets for genome-wide disease association studies.
    Wollstein A; Herrmann A; Wittig M; Nothnagel M; Franke A; Nürnberg P; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Hampe J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007; 35(17):e113. PubMed ID: 17726055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical multilocus methods for disequilibrium analysis in complex traits.
    Ott J; Hoh J
    Hum Mutat; 2001 Apr; 17(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11295826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.