207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18006597)
1. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.
Goldman LW
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8. PubMed ID: 18006597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The evaluation of the physical characteristics of a volumetric computer tomograph].
Crespi A; Leoni S; Montanari G; Paruccini N; Pedroli G; Grimaldi M; Salvini E
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 8643860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond.
Rogalla P; Kloeters C; Hein PA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19195530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Brenot J; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; Savignoni A; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):1871-92. PubMed ID: 19265204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
McCollough CH
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of correlated dose and sensitivity profiles on a multi-slice CT scanner.
Bahar Gogani J; Hägglund P; Wickman G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):332-6. PubMed ID: 15933132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study.
Dikkers R; Greuter MJ; Kristanto W; van Ooijen PM; Sijens PE; Willems TP; Oudkerk M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18308496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of image quality in megavoltage computed tomography with second generation scanning mode.
Nakagawa K; Aoki Y; Sasaki Y
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 9372549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.
Habibzadeh MA; Ay MR; Asl AR; Ghadiri H; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 21741870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-energy computed tomography: is there a penalty in image quality and radiation dose compared with single-energy computed tomography?
Thomas C; Ketelsen D; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Brodoefel H; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 20351526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate.
Månsson LG; Båth M; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 15933125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prototype heel effect compensation filter for cone-beam CT.
Mori S; Endo M; Nishizawa K; Ohno M; Miyazaki H; Tsujita K; Saito Y
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):N359-70. PubMed ID: 16264246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal imaging approaches: PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Pichler BJ; Judenhofer MS; Pfannenberg C
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2008; (185 Pt 1):109-32. PubMed ID: 18626801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
