61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18007158)
21. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT.
Romano L; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Xu JR; Chen KM; Dore R; Vanzulli A; Catalano C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):204-11. PubMed ID: 19064592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol.
Barrett BJ; Katzberg RW; Thomsen HS; Chen N; Sahani D; Soulez G; Heiken JP; Lepanto L; Ni ZH; Ni ZH; Nelson R
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):815-21. PubMed ID: 17035872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the effect of low- and iso-osmolar contrast agents on heart rate during chest CT angiography: results of a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Chartrand-Lefebvre C; White CS; Bhalla S; Mayo-Smith WW; Prenovault J; Vydareny KH; Soto JA; Ozkan OS; Chughtai AR; Soulez G
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):930-7. PubMed ID: 21212367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
Thomsen HS; Morcos SK; Erley CM; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Ni Z; Romano L;
Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients' body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material.
Ichikawa T; Erturk SM; Araki T
Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 16417983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Current contrast media delivery strategies for cardiac and pulmonary multidetector-row computed tomography angiography.
Ramos-Duran LR; Kalafut JF; Hanley M; Schoepf UJ
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Nov; 25(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 21042065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography.
Brink JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():S3-8. PubMed ID: 12908706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multidetector row CT of the liver.
Oto A; Tamm EP; Szklaruk J
Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Sep; 43(5):827-48, vii. PubMed ID: 16098342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast-induced nephropathy-choice of contrast agents to reduce renal risk.
Katholi RE
Am Heart Hosp J; 2009; 7(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 19742433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How to design injection protocols for multiple detector-row CT angiography (MDCTA).
Fleischmann D
Eur Radiol; 2005 Dec; 15 Suppl 5():E60-5. PubMed ID: 18637231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Safety profile of new non-ionic contrast media: renal tolerance.
Stacul F; Thomsen HS
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S6-9. PubMed ID: 9056157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
