BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18007172)

  • 1. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
    Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
    Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study on three algorithms of the ICD-10 Charlson comorbidity index with myocardial infarction patients].
    Kim KH
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2010 Jan; 43(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 20185982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
    Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
    Zhu H; Hill MD
    Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
    Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.
    Ward MM
    J Rheumatol; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1408-13. PubMed ID: 10852262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
    Bottle A; Aylin P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture.
    Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 25447352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the Charlson Comorbidity Index useful for predicting trauma outcomes?
    Gabbe BJ; Magtengaard K; Hannaford AP; Cameron PA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Apr; 12(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 15805322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versions.
    Vermeulen MJ; Tu JV; Schull MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):971-4. PubMed ID: 17689814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian logistic injury severity score: a method for predicting mortality using international classification of disease-9 codes.
    Burd RS; Ouyang M; Madigan D
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 May; 15(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 18439203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TMPM-ICD9: a trauma mortality prediction model based on ICD-9-CM codes.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Meredith W; Wagner J; Dick AW
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jun; 249(6):1032-9. PubMed ID: 19474696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of injury coding schemes on predicting hospital mortality after pediatric injury.
    Burd RS; Madigan D
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 16(7):639-45. PubMed ID: 19549015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.
    van Walraven C; Austin PC; Jennings A; Quan H; Forster AJ
    Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):626-33. PubMed ID: 19433995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using information on preexisting conditions to predict mortality from traumatic injury.
    Moore L; Lavoie A; Le Sage N; Bergeron E; Emond M; Liberman M; Abdous B
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 52(4):356-364.e2. PubMed ID: 18282639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality.
    Mnatzaganian G; Ryan P; Norman PE; Hiller JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 21803545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using automated clinical data for risk adjustment: development and validation of six disease-specific mortality predictive models for pay-for-performance.
    Tabak YP; Johannes RS; Silber JH
    Med Care; 2007 Aug; 45(8):789-805. PubMed ID: 17667314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there an optimal comorbidity index for prostate cancer?
    Alibhai SM; Leach M; Tomlinson GA; Krahn MD; Fleshner NE; Naglie G
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 18286512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multipurpose comorbidity scoring system performed better than the Charlson index.
    Holman CD; Preen DB; Baynham NJ; Finn JC; Semmens JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1006-14. PubMed ID: 16168346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of comorbidity indices for inpatient mortality prediction models.
    Martins M; Blais R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 16765268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.