These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1800749)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of the Philips 5306B electronic blood pressure monitor.
    Hall CL; Goodfellow J; Waites J
    J Med Eng Technol; 1991; 15(4-5):177-9. PubMed ID: 1800749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
    Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
    J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Colin STBP-680 at rest and during exercise: an automated blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating.
    Bond V; Bassett DR; Howley ET; Lewis J; Walker AJ; Swan PD; Tearney RJ; Adams RG
    Br J Sports Med; 1993 Jun; 27(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 8358579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the Takeda Medical (A & D) TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Practical experience and comparison with direct and indirect measurements.
    Høegholm A; Eidemak I; Kristensen KS; Bang LE; Madsen NH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1992 Jun; 52(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 1439512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Miniature electronic blood pressure monitor compared with a blind-reading mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnancy.
    Dawson AJ; Middlemiss C; Vanner TF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Nov; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 2583339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the sphygmomat 2 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor.
    Prior AJ; Peck K; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1990; 14(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 2283674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement variation among 12 electronic home blood pressure monitors.
    Yarows SA; Brook RD
    Am J Hypertens; 2000 Mar; 13(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 10777032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Takeda Model UA-751 blood pressure and pulse rate monitor.
    Harrison DW; Crews WD
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 1393203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Home blood pressure: variability, comparison with office readings and proposal for reference values. Groupe de la Mesure, French Society of Hypertension.
    de Gaudemaris R; Chau NP; Mallion JM
    J Hypertens; 1994 Jul; 12(7):831-8. PubMed ID: 7963513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of home blood pressure monitors in children and adolescents.
    Wells TG; Neaville WA; Arnold JR; Belsha CW
    Am J Med Sci; 1998 Feb; 315(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9472910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method.
    Yarows SA
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17890974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
    Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
    Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard ausculatory method using a mercury manometer.
    Mufunda J; Sparks B; Chifamba J; Dakwa C; Matenga JA; Adams JM; Sparks HV
    Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Aug; 42(8):230-2. PubMed ID: 8990566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superiority of home blood pressure measurements over office measurements for testing antihypertensive drugs.
    Vaur L; Dubroca I; Dutrey-Dupagne C; Genès N; Chatellier G; Bouvier-d'Yvoire M; Elkik F; Ménard J
    Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 10212339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The new ambulatory non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system, Takeda Medical TM 2420. Reliability and practical experiences].
    Eidemak I; Høegholm A; Kristensen KS; Madsen NH; Nielsen HS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jan; 153(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 1994554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A design and study of a novel electronic device for cuff-pressure monitoring].
    Wang S; Li W; Li W; Song D; Chen D; Duan J; Li C; Li G
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2017 Jun; 29(6):551-555. PubMed ID: 28625247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometry.
    Brown MA; Buddle ML; Cario GM; Whitworth JA
    Am J Hypertens; 1993 Sep; 6(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 8110427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.