BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18008062)

  • 1. Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens.
    Bolt HM; Huici-Montagud A
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 82(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 18008062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.
    Nielsen GD; Ovrebø S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 18502550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, part II: contributions of the EUROTOX specialty section for carcinogenesis.
    Bolt HM; Degen GH
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15159528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approaches for the setting of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for carcinogens.
    Högberg J; Järnberg J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2023 Dec; 53(3):131-167. PubMed ID: 37366107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approaches for the development of occupational exposure limits for man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).
    Ziegler-Skylakakis K
    Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 553(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 15288531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
    Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
    Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC
    Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of uncertainty factors by the European Commission Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits: a follow-up.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Aug; 48(7):513-521. PubMed ID: 29987986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk assessment of chemical carcinogens and thresholds.
    Neumann HG
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 19545196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Topping M
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the benchmark-dose (BMD) approach to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) for genotoxic carcinogens: N-nitrosamines.
    Blum K; FitzGerald R; Wilks MF; Barle EL; Hopf NB
    J Appl Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):1183-1200. PubMed ID: 36840679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a framework for the selection of an appropriate occupational exposure limit for manganese.
    Deveau M; Maier A; Krewski D
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():249-256. PubMed ID: 27663849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of uncertainty factors by the SCOEL in their derivation of health-based occupational exposure limits.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 40(9):791-8. PubMed ID: 20860525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
    Hartwig A; Arand M; Epe B; Guth S; Jahnke G; Lampen A; Martus HJ; Monien B; Rietjens IMCM; Schmitz-Spanke S; Schriever-Schwemmer G; Steinberg P; Eisenbrand G
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 94(6):1787-1877. PubMed ID: 32542409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold and non-threshold chemical carcinogens: A survey of the present regulatory landscape.
    Bevan RJ; Harrison PTC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():291-302. PubMed ID: 28119000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing an occupational exposure limit for hexavalent chromium in the European Union.
    Cross HJ; Faux SP; Levy LS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 26(1 Pt 2):S72-6. PubMed ID: 9380839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.