78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1801949)
1. The cytological prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in colposcopically directed biopsies.
Parham DM; Wiredu EK; Hussein KA
Cytopathology; 1991; 2(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 1801949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection: punch biopsy versus cervical smear.
Gitsch G; Reinthaller A; Tatra G; Breitenecker G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 249(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 1665685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the accuracy of cytology in women referred for colposcopy and biopsy: the results of a 1 year audit.
Contreras-Melendez L; Herbert A; Millward-Sadler GH; Moore IE; Masson GM; Camillieri AP; Shepherd N
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 1288651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear.
Maggi R; Zannoni E; Giorda G; Biraghi P; Sideri M
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Dec; 35(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 2599462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nuovo GJ; Blanco JS; Leipzig S; Smith D
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2160630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
