These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18019836)

  • 1. Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies.
    Dalby MJ
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2007; 2(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 18019836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading.
    Biggs MJ; Richards RG; Gadegaard N; Wilkinson CD; Dalby MJ
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Feb; 18(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 17323174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured NaOH-etched PLGA scaffolds.
    Smith LL; Niziolek PJ; Haberstroh KM; Nauman EA; Webster TJ
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2007; 2(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 18019837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurons on nanotopographies: behavioral responses and biological implications.
    Kang K; Kim MH; Park M; Choi IS
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Jan; 14(1):513-21. PubMed ID: 24730279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials.
    Kriparamanan R; Aswath P; Zhou A; Tang L; Nguyen KT
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2006 Jul; 6(7):1905-19. PubMed ID: 17025103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation.
    Park J; Bauer S; Schlegel KA; Neukam FW; von der Mark K; Schmuki P
    Small; 2009 Mar; 5(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 19235196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography.
    Choi CH; Hagvall SH; Wu BM; Dunn JC; Beygui RE; CJ Kim CJ
    Biomaterials; 2007 Mar; 28(9):1672-9. PubMed ID: 17174392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of nanoscale surface roughness on neural cell attachment on silicon.
    Khan SP; Auner GG; Newaz GM
    Nanomedicine; 2005 Jun; 1(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 17292068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide).
    Wan Y; Wang Y; Liu Z; Qu X; Han B; Bei J; Wang S
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(21):4453-9. PubMed ID: 15701374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive tissue engineering composites and cell printing.
    Burg KJ; Boland T
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2003; 22(5):84-91. PubMed ID: 14699941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications.
    Wood MA
    J R Soc Interface; 2007 Feb; 4(12):1-17. PubMed ID: 17015295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human fibroblast and human bone marrow cell response to lithographically nanopatterned adhesive domains on protein rejecting substrates.
    Berry CC; Curtis AS; Oreffo RO; Agheli H; Sutherland DS
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2007 Sep; 6(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 17926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fibroblast response is enhanced by poly(L-lactic acid) nanotopography edge density and proximity.
    Milner KR; Siedlecki CA
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2007; 2(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 17722548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography.
    Teixeira AI; McKie GA; Foley JD; Bertics PJ; Nealey PF; Murphy CJ
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jul; 27(21):3945-54. PubMed ID: 16580065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography.
    Lim JY; Dreiss AD; Zhou Z; Hansen JC; Siedlecki CA; Hengstebeck RW; Cheng J; Winograd N; Donahue HJ
    Biomaterials; 2007 Apr; 28(10):1787-97. PubMed ID: 17218005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precise control of cell adhesion by combination of surface chemistry and soft lithography.
    Zheng W; Zhang W; Jiang X
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2013 Jan; 2(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 23184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Porogen-induced surface modification of nano-fibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds for tissue engineering.
    Liu X; Won Y; Ma PX
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jul; 27(21):3980-7. PubMed ID: 16580063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between the fibroblastic behaviour and surface properties of RGD-immobilized PCL membranes.
    Karakecili A; Satriano C; Gumusderelioglu M; Marletta G
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Feb; 18(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 17323164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurite development in PC12 cells cultured on nanopillars and nanopores with sizes comparable with filopodia.
    Haq F; Anandan V; Keith C; Zhang G
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2007; 2(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 17722518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of colloidal nanotopography on initial fibroblast adhesion and morphology.
    Wood MA; Wilkinson CD; Curtis AS
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2006 Mar; 5(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 16570870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.