BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18020538)

  • 1. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain.
    Simpson KN; Jones WJ; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(12):807-17. PubMed ID: 18020538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease.
    Simpson KN; Luo MP; Chumney EC; King MS; Brun S
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17177581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) based regimens for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced United Kingdom patients in 2011.
    Simpson KN; Baran RW; Collomb D; Beck EJ; Van de Steen O; Dietz B
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):796-806. PubMed ID: 22563716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the US.
    Simpson KN; Jones WJ; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(7):443-52. PubMed ID: 17563124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study.
    Simpson KN; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Adv Ther; 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19219410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the United States.
    Broder MS; Chang EY; Bentley TG; Juday T; Uy J
    J Med Econ; 2011; 14(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21288058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive, protease inhibitor-resistant, HIV-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.
    Moeremans K; Hemmett L; Hjelmgren J; Allegri G; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():147-67. PubMed ID: 21182349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-utility analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir + ritonavir administered as first-line therapy for the treatment of HIV infection in Italy: from randomised trial to real world.
    Foglia E; Bonfanti P; Rizzardini G; Bonizzoni E; Restelli U; Ricci E; Porazzi E; Scolari F; Croce D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57777. PubMed ID: 23460905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults with evidence of protease inhibitor resistance included in the TITAN Trial.
    Brogan A; Mauskopf J; Talbird SE; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():129-46. PubMed ID: 21182348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis between darunavir/ritonavir and other protease inhibitors in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency syndrome type 1-infected patients in Spain].
    Smets E; Brogan AJ; Hill A; Adriaenssen I; Sawyer AW; Domingo-Pedrol P; Gostkorzewicz J; Ledesma F
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2013; 31(7):430-6. PubMed ID: 23260386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lopinavir/ritonavir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for HIV infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis for the United States.
    Simpson KN; Pei PP; Möller J; Baran RW; Dietz B; Woodward W; Migliaccio-Walle K; Caro JJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 May; 31(5):427-44. PubMed ID: 23620210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve women of childbearing age.
    Möller J; Desai K; Simpson K; Baran RW; Van de Steen O; Dietz B; Gooch K
    J Med Econ; 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.
    Moeremans K; Annemans L; Löthgren M; Allegri G; Wyffels V; Hemmet L; Caekelbergh K; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():107-28. PubMed ID: 21182347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in Canada.
    Brogan AJ; Smets E; Mauskopf JA; Manuel SA; Adriaenssen I
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):903-17. PubMed ID: 24906477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV.
    Simpson KN; Strassburger A; Jones WJ; Dietz B; Rajagopalan R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19254048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of atazanavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-1 patients in Sweden.
    Thuresson PO; Heeg B; Lescrauwaet B; Sennfält K; Alaeus A; Neubauer A
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2011 Apr; 43(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 21231811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection.
    Simpson KN; Luo MP; Chumney E; Sun E; Brun S; Ashraf T
    HIV Clin Trials; 2004; 5(5):294-304. PubMed ID: 15562370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir in highly treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in the USA.
    Mauskopf J; Brogan A; Martin S; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():83-105. PubMed ID: 21182346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya.
    Simpson KN; Baran RW; Kirbach SE; Dietz B
    Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1048-54. PubMed ID: 22152173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Successful treatment with atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir combination therapy in protease inhibitor-susceptible and protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-infected patients.
    Gilliam BL; Chan-Tack KM; Qaqish RB; Rode RA; Fantry LE; Redfield RR
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2006 Nov; 20(11):745-59. PubMed ID: 17134349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.