These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18020802)

  • 1. Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.
    Levashina J; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1638-56. PubMed ID: 18020802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
    Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The staff nurse employment interview: predicting performance outcomes. Part II.
    Heslin KA; Faux SA
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1991; 4(4):30-6. PubMed ID: 1747381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.
    Schmidt FL; Zimmerman RD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 15161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The measurement of interview structure in five types of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic interviews.
    Beck SM; Perry JC
    Psychiatry; 2008; 71(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 18834273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric evaluation and further validation of the Hagedoorn et al. modified EVLN measure.
    Liljegren M; Nordlund A; Ekberg K
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Apr; 49(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 18352987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 16737358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construct validity of the Life Orientation Test.
    Terrill DR; Friedman DG; Gottschalk LA; Haaga DA
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):550-63. PubMed ID: 12511020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial evaluations in the interview: relationships with subsequent interviewer evaluations and employment offers.
    Barrick MR; Swider BW; Stewart GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Nov; 95(6):1163-72. PubMed ID: 20718533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the handshake in employment interviews.
    Stewart GL; Dustin SL; Barrick MR; Darnold TC
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Sep; 93(5):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18808231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pre-employment interview.
    Grieshaber W
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(4):14-6, 18-20, 22-4; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 16187606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.
    Grieve R; Elliott J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 May; 16(5):364-9. PubMed ID: 23574347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
    Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue.
    Lim J; Butcher JN
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Aug; 67(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 16367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients.
    Baity MR; Siefert CJ; Chambers A; Blais MA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17266410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.
    Law SJ; Bourdage J; O'Neill TA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1771. PubMed ID: 27895609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.