These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18021148)

  • 1. Self-rated "no-" and "low-" risk pregnancy: a comparison of outcomes for women in obstetric-led and midwife-led units in England.
    Symon AG; Paul J; Butchart M; Carr V; Dugard P
    Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 18021148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Care and environment in midwife-led and obstetric-led units: a comparison of mothers' and birth partners' perceptions.
    Symon AG; Dugard P; Butchart M; Carr V; Paul J
    Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 21251736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lavender T; Alfirevic Z; Walkinshaw S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16880298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Child births in a modified midwife managed unit: selection and transfer according to intended place of delivery.
    Holt J; Vold IN; Backe B; Johansen MV; Oian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Mar; 80(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 11207485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midwife-led care unit for 'low risk' pregnant women in a Japanese hospital.
    Suzuki S; Hiraizumi Y; Satomi M; Miyake H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1046-50. PubMed ID: 21231841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.
    Green JM; Baston HA
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 17324172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians.
    Hueston WJ; Rudy M
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Nov; 37(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8228856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of an experimental midwife-led unit in Scotland.
    Mahmood TA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Mar; 23(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 12745552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with non-normal birth outcomes for low-risk women in an inner-city hospital.
    McDermott AM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20189128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers.
    Johnson M; Stewart H; Langdon R; Kelly P; Yong L
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2005; 22(3):21-7. PubMed ID: 16499237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
    Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
    Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of the first midwife-led birth centre in Italy: 5 years' experience.
    Morano S; Cerutti F; Mistrangelo E; Pastorino D; Benussi M; Costantini S; Ragni N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Oct; 276(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 17410373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial.
    Bernitz S; Aas E; Øian P
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 22901492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends and characteristics of births attended by midwives.
    Clarke SC; Martin JA; Taffel SM
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1997; 78(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 9029705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwives' competence: is it affected by working in a rural location?
    Hundley VA; Tucker JS; van Teijlingen E; Kiger A; Ireland JC; Harris F; Farmer J; Caldow JL; Bryers H
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):764. PubMed ID: 17691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midwives' perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in The Flanders, Belgium.
    Mead M; Bogaerts A; Reyns M
    Midwifery; 2007 Dec; 23(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 17126968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of teenage pregnancy.
    Mahavarkar SH; Madhu CK; Mule VD
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 28(6):604-7. PubMed ID: 19003655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beginning an action research project to investigate the feasibility of a midwife-led normal birthing unit in China.
    Mander R; Cheung NF; Wang X; Fu W; Zhu J
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Feb; 19(3-4):517-26. PubMed ID: 19732249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal factors and the probability of a planned home birth.
    Anthony S; Buitendijk SE; Offerhaus PM; Dommelen P; Pal-de Bruin KM
    BJOG; 2005 Jun; 112(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 15924531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.