These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18021149)

  • 21. 'What about the mother?' Women's and caregivers' perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates.
    Litorp H; Mgaya A; Kidanto HL; Johnsdotter S; Essén B
    Midwifery; 2015 Jul; 31(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 25886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.
    Long Q; Kingdon C; Yang F; Renecle MD; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
    PLoS Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):e1002672. PubMed ID: 30325928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.
    Boz İ; Teskereci G; Akman G
    Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26846560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Timing the provision of a pregnancy decision-aid: temporal patterns of preference for mode of birth during pregnancy.
    Shorten A; Shorten B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Oct; 97(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25082724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why women choose trial of labor or repeat cesarean section.
    McClain CS
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Sep; 21(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 4031794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.
    Coates D; Thirukumar P; Spear V; Brown G; Henry A
    Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 31607640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery.
    Bergeron V
    Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):478-87. PubMed ID: 17927624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.
    Yee LM; Kaimal AJ; Houston KA; Wu E; Thiet MP; Nakagawa S; Caughey AB; Firouzian A; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):377.e1-24. PubMed ID: 25446662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors Influencing Polish Women's Preference for the Mode of Delivery and Shared-Decision Making: Has Anything Changed over the Last Decade?
    Walędziak M; Jodzis A; Różańska-Walędziak A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Dec; 58(12):. PubMed ID: 36556984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The implications of objectification theory for women's health: menstrual suppression and "maternal request" cesarean delivery.
    Andrist LC
    Health Care Women Int; 2008 May; 29(5):551-65. PubMed ID: 18437600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Primigravid women's views of being approached to participate in a hypothetical term cephalic trial of planned vaginal birth versus planned cesarean birth.
    Lavender T; Kingdon C
    Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 19747268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
    Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.
    O'Donovan C; O'Donovan J
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 29105822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.
    Béhague DP; Victora CG; Barros FC
    BMJ; 2002 Apr; 324(7343):942-5. PubMed ID: 11964338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Women's perceptions of vaginal and cesarean deliveries.
    Cranley MS; Hedahl KJ; Pegg SH
    Nurs Res; 1983; 32(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 6549836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.
    Moffat MA; Bell JS; Porter MA; Lawton S; Hundley V; Danielian P; Bhattacharya S
    BJOG; 2007 Jan; 114(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17233863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 2(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 21742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications.
    Weaver JJ; Statham H; Richards M
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17324176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experiences of women who have a vaginal birth after requesting a cesarean section due to a fear of birth: a biographical, narrative, interpretative study.
    Ramvi E; Tangerud M
    Nurs Health Sci; 2011 Sep; 13(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 21696529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ; Hundley V; McCheyne AL; Hall MH; Gurney E; Milne J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.