These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18021823)

  • 1. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Lagouvardos PE; Fougia AG; Diamantopoulou SA; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 19105990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
    Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
    Kanawati A; Richards MW
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.
    Dozić A; Kleverlaan CJ; El-Zohairy A; Feilzer AJ; Khashayar G
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17362418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
    Ahn JS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides.
    Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 9863448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants.
    Cha HS; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.