These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18022139)

  • 1. Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device.
    Lee YH; Su MC
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 18022139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effect of four different pointing device designs on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during mousing tasks.
    Lin MY; Young JG; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():259-64. PubMed ID: 25479996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left-handed versus right-handed computer mouse use: effect on upper-extremity posture.
    Delisle A; Imbeau D; Santos B; Plamondon A; Montpetit Y
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 14985137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new input device: comparison to three commercially available mouses.
    Brown JN; Albert WJ; Croll J
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):208-27. PubMed ID: 17419155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical exposure differences between children and adults when using standard and small computer input devices.
    Blackstone JM; Karr C; Camp J; Johnson PW
    Ergonomics; 2008 Jun; 51(6):872-89. PubMed ID: 18484401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use.
    Lee DL; McLoone H; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17400173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical workload during use of speech recognition and traditional computer input devices.
    Juul-Kristensen B; Laursen B; Pilegaard M; Jensen BR
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 14660208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experiment on a novel user input for computer interface utilizing tongue input for the severely disabled.
    Kencana AP; Heng J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Nov; 3(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19117196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four cursor control devices during a target acquisition task for laparoscopic tool control.
    Herring SR; Trejo AE; Hallbeck MS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 19426963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of assessing upper limb postures among workers performing manufacturing tasks.
    Dartt A; Rosecrance J; Gerr F; Chen P; Anton D; Merlino L
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 19103432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Notebook computer use on a desk, lap and lap support: effects on posture, performance and comfort.
    Asundi K; Odell D; Luce A; Dennerlein JT
    Ergonomics; 2010 Jan; 53(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 20069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Input Hardware and Work Surface Angle on Upper Limb Posture in a Hybrid Computer Workstation.
    Kingston DC; Riddell MF; McKinnon CD; Gallagher KM; Callaghan JP
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 26424775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of non-keyboard input device checklists through assessments.
    Woods V; Hastings S; Buckle P; Haslam R
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 14559410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a vertical keyboard design on typing performance, user comfort and muscle tension.
    van Galen GP; Liesker H; de Haan A
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16516844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of computer display height and desk design on 3D posture during information technology work by young adults.
    Straker L; Burgess-Limerick R; Pollock C; Murray K; Netto K; Coleman J; Skoss R
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):336-49. PubMed ID: 17188894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of upper extremity support on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during keyboard use.
    Cook C; Burgess-Limerick R; Papalia S
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 15145291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of functional parameters and comfort of a new computer mouse as compared with other types of input devices.
    Dehghan N; Choobineh A; Razeghi M; Hasanzadeh J; Irandoost M; Ebrahimi S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 26694001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of workstation changes and behavioral interventions on safe typing postures in an office.
    Gravina N; Lindstrom-Hazel D; Austin J
    Work; 2007; 29(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 17942996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equipment control in a sterile environment using the Gyromouse and a new interface, the user interface (UI) wand.
    Stefels CN; Kneissner J; Aarnink RG; Kaufholz P; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2007; 16(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 17573621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.