136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18022672)
21. Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species in Homo habilis?
Miller JA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Apr; 84(4):385-98. PubMed ID: 2053613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental metric comparisons of Morotopithecus and Afropithecus: implications for the validity of the genus Morotopithecus.
Patel BA; Grossman A
J Hum Evol; 2006 Nov; 51(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 16914180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Role of carnivores in the accumulation of the Sterkfontein Member 4 hominid assemblage: a taphonomic reassessment of the complete hominid fossil sample (1936-1999).
Pickering TR; Clarke RJ; Moggi-Cecchi J
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Sep; 125(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 15293327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Size and shape variation in the proximal femur of Australopithecus africanus.
Harmon E
J Hum Evol; 2009 Jun; 56(6):551-9. PubMed ID: 19446306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A re-evaluation of the metric diversity within Homo erectus.
Kidder JH; Durband AC
J Hum Evol; 2004 Mar; 46(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 14984785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Size variation in early human mandibles and molars from Klasies River, South Africa: comparison with other middle and late Pleistocene assemblages and with modern humans.
Royer DF; Lockwood CA; Scott JE; Grine FE
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):312-23. PubMed ID: 19382177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The taxonomic implications of cranial shape variation in Homo erectus.
Baab KL
J Hum Evol; 2008 Jun; 54(6):827-47. PubMed ID: 18191986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sex-biased sampling may influence Homo naledi tooth size variation.
Delezene LK; Scott JE; Irish JD; Villaseñor A; Skinner MM; Hawks J; Berger LR
J Hum Evol; 2024 Feb; 187():103490. PubMed ID: 38266614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Taphonomic perspectives on hominid site use and foraging strategies during Bed II times at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.
Egeland CP; Domínguez-Rodrigo M
J Hum Evol; 2008 Dec; 55(6):1031-52. PubMed ID: 18842286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Testing for multiple species in fossil samples: an evaluation and comparison of tests for equal relative variation.
Donnelly SM; Kramer A
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Apr; 108(4):507-29. PubMed ID: 10229391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Earliest Miocene hominoid from Southeast Asia.
Kunimatsu Y; Ratanasthien B; Nakaya H; Saegusa H; Nagaoka S
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 15160364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Testing the taxonomic integrity of Paranthropus boisei sensu stricto.
Silverman N; Richmond B; Wood B
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Jun; 115(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 11385603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Population systematics of chimpanzees using molar morphometrics.
Pilbrow V
J Hum Evol; 2006 Dec; 51(6):646-62. PubMed ID: 16965803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New geochronological, paleoclimatological, and archaeological data from the Narmada Valley hominin locality, central India.
Patnaik R; Chauhan PR; Rao MR; Blackwell BA; Skinner AR; Sahni A; Chauhan MS; Khan HS
J Hum Evol; 2009 Feb; 56(2):114-33. PubMed ID: 19118867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Auditory ossicles from southwest Asian Mousterian sites.
Quam R; Rak Y
J Hum Evol; 2008 Mar; 54(3):414-33. PubMed ID: 18035396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lingual incisor traits in modern hominoids and an assessment of their utility for fossil hominoid taxonomy.
Pilbrow V
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Mar; 129(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 16323204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pierolapithecus and the functional morphology of Miocene ape hand phalanges: paleobiological and evolutionary implications.
Almécija S; Alba DM; Moyà-Solà S
J Hum Evol; 2009 Sep; 57(3):284-97. PubMed ID: 19631964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ecosystem functioning in stream assemblages from different regions: contrasting responses to variation in detritivore richness, evenness and density.
McKie BG; Woodward G; Hladyz S; Nistorescu M; Preda E; Popescu C; Giller PS; Malmqvist B
J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 18298521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of taphonomic processes on dental microwear.
King T; Andrews P; Boz B
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Mar; 108(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 10096686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Symphyseal shape variation in extant and fossil hominoids, and the symphysis of Australopithecus bahrelghazali.
Guy F; Mackaye HT; Likius A; Vignaud P; Schmittbuhl M; Brunet M
J Hum Evol; 2008 Jul; 55(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 18222528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
