These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1802369)

  • 1. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Each year more than 1,000 manuscripts are submitted for our consideration.
    Soc Sci Med; 1989; 29(7):I-II. PubMed ID: 2799420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who referees the referees?
    Isbister WH
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
    Trilla A
    Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidentiality of referees.
    Case M
    Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6563):292. PubMed ID: 8552169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
    Brandon D; McGrath JM
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to cope with manuscript rejection.
    Peregrin T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Feb; 107(2):190, 192-3. PubMed ID: 17258951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heaven or hell: publishing and revision.
    Enns JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22288698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?
    Relman AS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.