191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18024045)
21. Head to head comparison between perfusion and function during accelerated high-dose dipyridamole magnetic resonance stress for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Pingitore A; Lombardi M; Scattini B; De Marchi D; Aquaro GD; Positano V; Picano E
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 101(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18157957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved correction of spatial inhomogeneities of surface coils in quantitative analysis of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging.
Kremers FP; Hofman MB; Groothuis JG; Jerosch-Herold M; Beek AM; Zuehlsdorff S; Nielles-Vallespin S; van Rossum AC; Heethaar RM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20027593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combined functional and morphological imaging consisting of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and 16-detector multislice spiral CT angiography in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease: first experiences.
Hacker M; Jakobs T; Matthiesen F; Nikolaou K; Becker C; Knez A; Tiling R
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 17825738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of coronary artery disease with nicorandil stress magnetic resonance imaging.
Kawase Y; Nishimoto M; Hato K; Okajima K; Yoshikawa J
Osaka City Med J; 2004 Dec; 50(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 15819303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of cardiac small vessel disease by adenosine-stress magnetic resonance.
Bernhardt P; Levenson B; Albrecht A; Engels T; Strohm O
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 121(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 17196688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of necessity for coronary artery revascularization by adenosine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Bernhardt P; Engels T; Levenson B; Haase K; Albrecht A; Strohm O
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 112(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 16271778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Noninvasive determination of regional myocardial perfusion with first-pass magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Nakajima T; Oriuchi N; Tsushima Y; Funabasama S; Aoki J; Endo K
Acad Radiol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15217598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".
Bruder O; Breuckmann F; Jensen C; Jochims M; Naber CK; Barkhausen J; Erbel R; Sabin GV;
Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 18344033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is the diagnostic yield of myocardial stress perfusion MRI impaired by three-vessel coronary artery disease?
Klumpp B; Miller S; Seeger A; May AE; Gawaz MP; Claussen CD; Kramer U
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 24523361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion with EP-3600, a collagen-specific contrast agent: initial feasibility study in a swine model.
Spuentrup E; Ruhl KM; Botnar RM; Wiethoff AJ; Buhl A; Jacques V; Greenfield MT; Krombach GA; Günther RW; Vangel MG; Caravan P
Circulation; 2009 Apr; 119(13):1768-75. PubMed ID: 19307474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Screening of asymptomatic coronaropathy with adenosine stress myocardial perfusion MRI: a pilot study].
Brisbois D; Raskinet B; Djekic J; Morar A; Broussaud T; Mancini I; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 17555067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging using sliding-window conjugate-gradient highly constrained back-projection reconstruction for detection of coronary artery disease.
Ma H; Yang J; Liu J; Ge L; An J; Tang Q; Li H; Zhang Y; Chen D; Wang Y; Liu J; Liang Z; Lin K; Jin L; Bi X; Li K; Li D
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 109(8):1137-41. PubMed ID: 22264595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comprehensive MR evaluation of renal disease: added clinical value of quantified renal perfusion values over single MR angiography.
Attenberger UI; Sourbron SP; Schoenberg SO; Morelli J; Leiner T; Schoeppler GM; Samtleben W; Birkemeier KL; Glaser C; Reiser MF; Michaely HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 20027580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady-state, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging.
Merkle N; Wöhrle J; Grebe O; Nusser T; Kunze M; Kestler HA; Kochs M; Hombach V
Heart; 2007 Nov; 93(11):1381-5. PubMed ID: 17488772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [X-ray densitometric measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve in symptomatic patients without angiographically detectable coronary stenoses].
Havers J; Haude M; Erbel R; Spiller P
Herz; 2008 Apr; 33(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 18568317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion with a spin-labeling technique: preliminary results in patients with coronary artery disease.
Wacker CM; Fidler F; Dueren C; Hirn S; Jakob PM; Ertl G; Haase A; Bauer WR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Nov; 18(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 14579398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High-resolution versus standard-resolution cardiovascular MR myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Motwani M; Maredia N; Fairbairn TA; Kozerke S; Radjenovic A; Greenwood JP; Plein S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 22499848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
Kühl HP; Katoh M; Buhr C; Krombach GA; Hoffmann R; Rassaf T; Neizel M; Buecker A; Kelm M
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1090-5. PubMed ID: 17437733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Renal perfusion: comparison of saturation-recovery TurboFLASH measurements at 1.5T with saturation-recovery TurboFLASH and time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique (TREAT) at 3.0T.
Michaely HJ; Nael K; Schoenberg SO; Finn JP; Oesingmann N; Lodemann KP; Reiser MF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1413-9. PubMed ID: 17051532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic pulmonary perfusion and flow quantification with MR imaging, 3.0T vs. 1.5T: initial results.
Nael K; Michaely HJ; Lee M; Goldin J; Laub G; Finn JP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 24(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 16786566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
