146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18024436)
21. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data.
Peloschek P; Sailer J; Weber M; Herold CJ; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 17456878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variable radiological lung nodule evaluation leads to divergent management recommendations.
Nair A; Bartlett EC; Walsh SLF; Wells AU; Navani N; Hardavella G; Bhalla S; Calandriello L; Devaraj A; Goo JM; Klein JS; MacMahon H; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Seo JB; Sverzellati N; Desai SR; ;
Eur Respir J; 2018 Dec; 52(6):. PubMed ID: 30409817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Classification of CT Pulmonary Opacities as Perifissural Nodules: Reader Variability.
Schreuder A; van Ginneken B; Scholten ET; Jacobs C; Prokop M; Sverzellati N; Desai SR; Devaraj A; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):867-875. PubMed ID: 29969076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.
Henschke CI; McCauley DI; Yankelevitz DF; Naidich DP; McGuinness G; Miettinen OS; Libby DM; Pasmantier MW; Koizumi J; Altorki NK; Smith JP
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9173):99-105. PubMed ID: 10408484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management.
van Riel SJ; Jacobs C; Scholten ET; Wittenberg R; Winkler Wille MM; de Hoop B; Sprengers R; Mets OM; Geurts B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):924-931. PubMed ID: 30066248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assisted versus Manual Interpretation of Low-Dose CT Scans for Lung Cancer Screening: Impact on Lung-RADS Agreement.
Jacobs C; Schreuder A; van Riel SJ; Scholten ET; Wittenberg R; Wille MMW; de Hoop B; Sprengers R; Mets OM; Geurts B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Sep; 3(5):e200160. PubMed ID: 34559005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods.
Bogot NR; Kazerooni EA; Kelly AM; Quint LE; Desjardins B; Nan B
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):948-56. PubMed ID: 16087090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiating between Subsolid and Solid Pulmonary Nodules at CT: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement between Experienced Thoracic Radiologists.
Ridge CA; Yildirim A; Boiselle PM; Franquet T; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Tack D; Gevenois PA; Bankier AA
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):888-96. PubMed ID: 26458208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Semiquantitative visual approach to scoring lung cancer treatment response using computed tomography: a pilot study.
Gottlieb RH; Kumar P; Loud P; Klippenstein D; Raczyk C; Tan W; Lu J; Ramnath N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 19820504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement.
Ko JP; Chang J; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16126923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CT Screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project.
New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project Investigators
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):239-49. PubMed ID: 17392256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidental lung nodules on CT examinations of the abdomen: prevalence and reporting rates in the PACS era.
Rinaldi MF; Bartalena T; Giannelli G; Rinaldi G; Sverzellati N; Canini R; Gavelli G
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e84-8. PubMed ID: 19446417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Small solid noncalcified pulmonary nodules detected by screening chest computed tomography.
Jin SM; Choi SH; Yoo CG; Kim YW; Han SK; Shim YS; Lee SM
Respir Med; 2007 Sep; 101(9):1880-4. PubMed ID: 17587561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monitoring of smoking-induced emphysema with CT in a lung cancer screening setting: detection of real increase in extent of emphysema.
Gietema HA; Schilham AM; van Ginneken B; van Klaveren RJ; Lammers JW; Prokop M
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):890-7. PubMed ID: 17709835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans.
Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF; Naidich DP; McCauley DI; McGuinness G; Libby DM; Smith JP; Pasmantier MW; Miettinen OS
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):164-8. PubMed ID: 14990809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abdominal pain: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels with 16-section CT--reader lesion detection and interpretation time.
Jaffe TA; Martin LC; Miller CM; Franklin KM; Merkle EM; Thompson WM; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Paulson EK
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17185667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minor morphologic abnormalities of adrenal glands at CT: prognostic importance in patients with lung cancer.
Benitah N; Yeh BM; Qayyum A; Williams G; Breiman RS; Coakley FV
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):517-22. PubMed ID: 15858092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?
Revel MP; Bissery A; Bienvenu M; Aycard L; Lefort C; Frija G
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 15128990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.
McKee BJ; Regis SM; McKee AB; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 25176499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lung nodule detection in a high-risk population: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and low-dose computed tomography.
Sommer G; Tremper J; Koenigkam-Santos M; Delorme S; Becker N; Biederer J; Kauczor HU; Heussel CP; Schlemmer HP; Puderbach M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):600-5. PubMed ID: 24364923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
