BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18024770)

  • 1. Analysis of milk production traits in early lactation using a reaction norm model with unknown covariates.
    Shariati MM; Su G; Madsen P; Sorensen D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5759-66. PubMed ID: 18024770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.
    Fahey AG; Schutz MM; Lofgren DL; Schinckel AP; Stewart TS
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3889-99. PubMed ID: 17639000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.
    Raffrenato E; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Carvalheira J; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jul; 86(7):2470-9. PubMed ID: 12906065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Covariance functions across herd production levels for test day records on milk, fat, and protein yields.
    Veerkamp RF; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jun; 81(6):1690-701. PubMed ID: 9684176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3756-64. PubMed ID: 14672207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands.
    de Roos AP; Harbers AG; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2693-701. PubMed ID: 15328295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype by environment interaction for fertility, survival, and milk production traits in Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Carrick MJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4840-53. PubMed ID: 19038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records.
    Hayes BJ; Carrick M; Bowman P; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3736-44. PubMed ID: 14672205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands.
    Nauta WJ; Veerkamp RF; Brascamp EW; Bovenhuis H
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jul; 89(7):2729-37. PubMed ID: 16772592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian estimates of covariance components between lactation curve parameters and disease liability in Danish Holstein cows.
    Jakobsen JH; Rekaya R; Jensen J; Sorensen DA; Madsen P; Gianola D; Christensen LG; Pedersen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Sep; 86(9):3000-7. PubMed ID: 14507037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk fat depression in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; Carrick MJ; Veerkamp RF; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1166-77. PubMed ID: 15738250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjustment for heterogeneous covariance due to herd milk yield by transformation of test-day random regressions.
    Gengler N; Wiggans GR; Gillon A
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Aug; 88(8):2981-90. PubMed ID: 16027212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic analysis of milk production traits of polish black and white cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models.
    Strabel T; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3152-63. PubMed ID: 16840632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
    Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic parameter estimates of portuguese dairy cows for milk, fat, and protein using a spline test-day model.
    Silvestre AM; Petim-Batista F; Colaço J
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1225-30. PubMed ID: 15738256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.