These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18025653)

  • 1. Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 18025653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in glaucoma.
    Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Yaoeda K; Funaki S; Funaki H; Ofuchi N; Abe H
    J Glaucoma; 2004 Apr; 13(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 15097256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M; Capris P; Altieri M; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.
    Hong S; Na K; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 42(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 17823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
    De Tarso Pierre-Filho P; Gomes PR; Pierre ET; Pierre LM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(3):538-41. PubMed ID: 20099239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R; George R; Hemamalini A; Sathyamangalam Ve R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma.
    Tiwari US; Aishwarya A; Bhale A
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2018; 62(4):277-281. PubMed ID: 30891523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16633218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting Change Using Standard Global Perimetric Indices in Glaucoma.
    Gardiner SK; Demirel S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 176():148-156. PubMed ID: 28130041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls.
    Chauhan BC; House PH; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 117(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 9930157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Lan YW; Hsieh JW; Sun FJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20436367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L; Zeppieri M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 89(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15665349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.