These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18025753)

  • 1. Hearing, communication and cognition in low-frequency noise from armoured vehicles.
    Nakashima A; Abel SM; Duncan M; Smith D
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(35):35-41. PubMed ID: 18025753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of electronic ANR and conventional hearing protectors on vehicle backup alarm detection in noise.
    Casali JG; Robinson GS; Dabney EC; Gauger D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15151152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility and protective effectiveness of selected active noise reduction and conventional communications headsets.
    Gower DW; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1994 Jun; 36(2):350-67. PubMed ID: 8070798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Spencer DL
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 9309811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory backup alarms: distance-at-first-detection via in-situ experimentation on alarm design and hearing protection effects.
    Alali K; Casali JG
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3599-607. PubMed ID: 22317269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of an auditory situation awareness test battery for advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: detection subtest of DRILCOM (detection-recognition/identification-localization-communication).
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27905220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
    Manning C; Mermagen T; Scharine A
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Divided listening in noise in a mock-up of a military command post.
    Abel SM; Nakashima A; Smith I
    Mil Med; 2012 Apr; 177(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22594135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Azimuthal auditory localization of gunshots in a realistic field environment: effects of open-ear versus hearing protection-enhancement devices (HPEDs), military vehicle noise, and hearing impairment.
    Talcott KA; Casali JG; Keady JP; Killion MC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():S20-30. PubMed ID: 22264060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protector and communication headset attenuation.
    Zera J; Brammer AJ; Pan GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3486-97. PubMed ID: 9193042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
    Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss.
    Abel SM; Armstrong NM; Giguère C
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 8322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of noise and vibration in Canadian forces armoured vehicles.
    Nakashima AM; Borland MJ; Abel SM
    Ind Health; 2007 Apr; 45(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 17485877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound source identification with ANR earmuffs.
    Abel SM; Shelly Paik JE
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(27):1-10. PubMed ID: 16105245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):11-20. PubMed ID: 16053601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.
    Saliba I; Calmels MN; Wanna G; Iversenc G; James C; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 16015168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.