These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18025998)

  • 1. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception.
    Reiss LA; Gantz BJ; Turner CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18025998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
    Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Reiss LA; Perreau AE; Turner CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(6):357-72. PubMed ID: 22907151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting.
    Nardo WD; Cantore I; Marchese MR; Cianfrone F; Scorpecci A; Giannantonio S; Paludetti G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 265(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 18379812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.
    Fitzgerald MB; Sagi E; Jackson M; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Svirsky MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 18165793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.
    Başkent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1405-16. PubMed ID: 15807028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
    Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time.
    Vermeire K; Landsberger DM; Van de Heyning PH; Voormolen M; Kleine Punte A; Schatzer R; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 326():8-14. PubMed ID: 25840373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH; Berenstein CK
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of pitch perception as a function of cochlear implant electrode and its effect on speech perception with different frequency allocations.
    Grasmeder ML; Verschuur CA; van Besouw RM; Wheatley AMH; Newman TA
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 58(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 30370800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.