These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18027105)
1. Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: whose data, which values? Kopelman LM; Kopelman AE Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):373-91. PubMed ID: 18027105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU. Lantos JD N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(19):1851-1860. PubMed ID: 30403936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interests and neonates: there is more to the story than we explicitly acknowledge. Hester DM Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):357-72. PubMed ID: 17985107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are newborns morally different from older children? Janvier A; Bauer KL; Lantos JD Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 17985104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making. Ross LF Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):349-55. PubMed ID: 17975740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Harm and uncertainty in newborn intensive care. Kipnis K Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17985105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neonatal decision-making: beyond the standard of best interests. Truog RD; Sayeed SA Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):44-5. PubMed ID: 21337280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care. Wilkinson D J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):502-6. PubMed ID: 23355229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality-of-life considerations in substitute decision-making for severely disabled neonates: the problem of developing awareness. Kluge EH Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(5):351-66. PubMed ID: 19898956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding hydration and nutrition in newborns. Porta N; Frader J Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 17985106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses. Bucher HU; Klein SD; Hendriks MJ; Baumann-Hölzle R; Berger TM; Streuli JC; Fauchère JC; BMC Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 18(1):81. PubMed ID: 29471821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions. Wilkinson D; Truog R; Savulescu J Bioethics; 2016 Feb; 30(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 25908398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical cultural competence and the threat of ethical relativism. Hyun I Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2008; 17(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18312730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn. Tripp J; McGregor D Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2006 Jan; 91(1):F67-71. PubMed ID: 16371392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics at the end of life: who should make decisions about treatment limitation for young children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions? Gillam L; Sullivan J J Paediatr Child Health; 2011 Sep; 47(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 21951439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard. Kopelman LM J Med Philos; 2005 Aug; 30(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16029986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]