BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18027216)

  • 1. Adaptive designs for dose-finding studies based on sigmoid Emax model.
    Dragalin V; Hsuan F; Padmanabhan SK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1051-70. PubMed ID: 18027216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose finding designs for continuous responses and binary utility.
    Fedorov VV; Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1085-96. PubMed ID: 18027218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive Dc-optimal designs for dose finding based on a continuous efficacy endpoint.
    Padmanabhan SK; Dragalin V
    Biom J; 2010 Dec; 52(6):836-52. PubMed ID: 20891026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the efficiency of two-stage response-adaptive designs.
    Dette H; Bornkamp B; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1646-60. PubMed ID: 22865374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hypothesis testing and Bayesian estimation using a sigmoid Emax model applied to sparse dose-response designs.
    Thomas N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):657-77. PubMed ID: 17037264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal design for dose response using beta distributed responses.
    Wu Y; Fedorov VV; Propert KJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):753-71. PubMed ID: 16078383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal designs for estimating the interesting part of a dose-effect curve.
    Miller F; Guilbaud O; Dette H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1097-115. PubMed ID: 18027219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal adaptive design in clinical drug development: a simulation example.
    Maloney A; Karlsson MO; Simonsson US
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 47(10):1231-43. PubMed ID: 17906158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive designs for dose-finding in non-cancer phase II trials: influence of early unexpected outcomes.
    Resche-Rigon M; Zohar S; Chevret S
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 19029208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of multi-centre trials with binary response.
    Dragalin V; Fedorov V
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2701-19. PubMed ID: 16252268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian optimal adaptive designs for delayed-response dose-finding studies.
    Li W; Fu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):888-901. PubMed ID: 21830921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential designs for logistic phase I clinical trials.
    Liu G; Rosenberger WF; Haines LM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):605-21. PubMed ID: 17037261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal dose-finding designs with correlated continuous and discrete responses.
    Fedorov V; Wu Y; Zhang R
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 22162014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive optimal design for the E(max) model and its application in clinical trials.
    Leonov S; Miller S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):360-85. PubMed ID: 19212886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viewpoints on the FDA draft adaptive designs guidance from the PhRMA working group.
    Gallo P; Anderson K; Chuang-Stein C; Dragalin V; Gaydos B; Krams M; Pinheiro J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1115-24. PubMed ID: 21058107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose-ranging trials.
    Bornkamp B; Bretz F; Dmitrienko A; Enas G; Gaydos B; Hsu CH; König F; Krams M; Liu Q; Neuenschwander B; Parke T; Pinheiro J; Roy A; Sax R; Shen F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):965-95. PubMed ID: 18027208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.