BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1802874)

  • 1. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
    Utomi IL
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of adenoidectomy and changed mode of breathing on incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights and anterior face heights.
    Mahony D; Karsten A; Linder-Aronson S
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16429879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Relationship between molar dentoalveolar and craniofacial heights.
    Martina R; Farella M; Tagliaferri R; Michelotti A; Quaremba G; van Eijden TM
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):974-9. PubMed ID: 16448240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Roentgen cephalometric analysis of linear variables in a sample with normal occlusion].
    Muretić Z; Rak D
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2096838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of vertical facial growth in Korean adolescents analyzed with mixed-effects regression analysis.
    Moon SC; Kim HK; Kwon TK; Han SH; An CH; Park YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 23726331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach (vertical evaluation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 24047838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
    Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
    Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age.
    van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 1936138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using model-fitting.
    Savoye I; Loos R; Carels C; Derom C; Vlietinck R
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 9770105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric study of elderly with nearly intact dental arches.
    Shimizu T; Motegi E; Nomura M; Kaneko Y; Takeuchi F; Yamaguchi T; Miyazaki H; Harazaki M; Hirai M; Kurihara S; Yamaguchi H
    Gerodontology; 2006 Mar; 23(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16433644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.