375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18029394)
1. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of diagnostic lumbar MRI and nuclear imaging.
Mulconrey DS; Knight RQ; Bramble JD; Paknikar S; Harty PA
Spine J; 2006; 6(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 16517390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between lumbar segmental motion and pain response produced by a posterior-to-anterior force in persons with nonspecific low back pain.
Beneck GJ; Kulig K; Landel RF; Powers CM
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Apr; 35(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 15901121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative MRI study of upper and lower lumbar motion segments in patients with low back pain.
Saberi H; Rahimi L; Jahani L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):507-10. PubMed ID: 20075814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.
Edmondston SJ; Song S; Bricknell RV; Davies PA; Fersum K; Humphries P; Wickenden D; Singer KP
Man Ther; 2000 Aug; 5(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 11034886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.
Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Childs JD
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16181937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.
Abbott JH; Flynn TW; Fritz JM; Hing WA; Reid D; Whitman JM
Man Ther; 2009 Feb; 14(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17997344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of a single session of posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization and press-up exercise on pain response and lumbar spine extension in people with nonspecific low back pain.
Powers CM; Beneck GJ; Kulig K; Landel RF; Fredericson M
Phys Ther; 2008 Apr; 88(4):485-93. PubMed ID: 18258767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization.
Kulig K; Landel R; Powers CM
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Feb; 34(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 15029938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI.
Kulig K; Powers CM; Landel RF; Chen H; Fredericson M; Guillet M; Butts K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Jan; 8():8. PubMed ID: 17261197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraexaminer reliability of identifying a dysfunctional segment in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
Potter L; McCarthy C; Oldham J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006; 29(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 16584944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of the correct lumbar level using passive intersegmental motion testing.
Chakraverty RC; Pynsent PB; Westwood A; Chakraverty JK
Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 17924892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intertester agreement and validity of identifying lumbar pain provocative movement patterns using active and passive accessory movement tests.
Hidalgo B; Hall T; Nielens H; Detrembleur C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Feb; 37(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24401656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests.
Robinson HS; Mengshoel AM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):E270-5. PubMed ID: 24253798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in identifying and classifying degenerative marrow (Modic) changes on lumbar spine magnetic resonance scans.
Peterson CK; Gatterman B; Carter JC; Humphreys BK; Weibel A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Feb; 30(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 17320728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active trunk extensor contributions to dynamic posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 May; 27(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15148461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):567-78. PubMed ID: 14673406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible.
Chiradejnant A; Maher CG; Latimer J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Jan; 26(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 12532136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On "intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments..." Landel et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:43-49.
Abbott JH
Phys Ther; 2008 Apr; 88(4):536; author reply 536-7. PubMed ID: 18381299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
