These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18030136)

  • 21. One-stage explant-implant procedure of exposed porous orbital implants.
    Toft PB; Rasmussen ML; Prause JU
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 20528784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enucleation versus evisceration.
    O'Donnell BA; Kersten R; McNab A; Rose G; Rosser P
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 33(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15670071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evisceration with four anterior relaxing incisions and circumferential posterior sclerotomies with porous polyethylene orbital implants: an 8-year study.
    Kim KH; Lee H; Park M; Chi Mc; Lee J; Baek S
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):686-90. PubMed ID: 20074289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exposure rate of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene implants after enucleation.
    Mahoney NR; Grant MP; Iliff NT; Merbs SL
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(6):492-8. PubMed ID: 25369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.
    Son J; Kim CS; Yang J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retroscleral implantation technique for porous polyethylene orbital implant after evisceration.
    Choung HK; Han SK; Khwarg SI
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16238047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation.
    Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
    Yazici B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):786-7; author reply 787. PubMed ID: 17964325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new technique with the hydroxyapatite implant.
    Suvağ N; Katircioğlu Y; Duman S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2004; 48(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 15060803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enucleation with hydroxyapatite implantation versus evisceration plus scleral quadrisection and alloplastic implantation.
    Tari AS; Malihi M; Kasaee A; Tabatabaie SZ; Hamzedust K; Musavi MF; Rajabi MT
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009; 25(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 19300157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements.
    Shoamanesh A; Pang NK; Oestreicher JH
    Orbit; 2007 Sep; 26(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 17891645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Porous polyethylene orbital implant in the pediatric population.
    Iordanidou V; De Potter P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 15364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Secondary orbital ball implants after enucleation and evisceration: surgical management, morbidity, and long-term outcome.
    Quaranta-Leoni FM; Sposato S; Lorenzano D
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015; 31(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25025388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re: "comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients".
    Nasser QJ; Blaydon SM; Connor MA; Nakra T; Shepler TR; Neuhaus RW; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(5):391; author reply 391-2. PubMed ID: 21904174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Use of Medpor spherical implant: analysis of 61 orbital surgeries].
    Moura Eda M; Vieira GS
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17505711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orbital implants insertion to improve ocular prostheses motility.
    Goiato MC; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Ribeiro Pdo P; Moreno A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 20485072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant.
    Karesh JW; Dresner SC
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6. PubMed ID: 7936568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial eye amplitudes and characteristics in enucleated socket with porous polyethylene spherical and quad-motility implant.
    Lucci LM; Höfling-Lima AL; Erwenne CM; Toledo Cassano EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 18157310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends.
    Viswanathan P; Sagoo MS; Olver JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 91(5):616-9. PubMed ID: 17151061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients: indications and complications.
    Lang P; Kim JW; McGovern K; Reid MW; Subramanian K; Murphree AL; Berry JL
    Orbit; 2018 Dec; 37(6):438-443. PubMed ID: 29461921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.