These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18030136)

  • 61. Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants.
    Guillinta P; Vasani SN; Granet DB; Kikkawa DO
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 19(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 12644757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Massive retinal gliosis without retina.
    Matayoshi S; Takahashi WY; Mendonça Natalino RJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):e46-9. PubMed ID: 27085274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Primary placement of a titanium sleeve in hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Liao SL; Chen MS; Lin LL
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Apr; 19(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 15297860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Outcome of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene orbital implants (Medpor SST) in children with retinoblastoma.
    Choi YJ; Park C; Jin HC; Choung HK; Lee MJ; Kim N; Khwarg SI; Yu YS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1530-3. PubMed ID: 24064935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
    González-Candial M; Umaña MA; Galvez C; Medel R; Ayala E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):711-2. PubMed ID: 17386291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Implantation of porous polytetrafluoroethylene orbital inserts: complications. Communication 2].
    Nikolaenko VP; Astakhov IuS
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2006; 122(2):21-4. PubMed ID: 16886745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Orbital implants: potential new directions.
    Hicks CR; Morrison D; Lou X; Crawford GJ; Gadjatsy A; Constable IJ
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2006 Nov; 3(6):805-15. PubMed ID: 17280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Animal model of porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Goldberg RA; Dresner SC; Braslow RA; Kossovsky N; Legmann A
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 8086357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evisceration vs. enucleation.
    Goisis M; Guareschi M; Miglior S; Giannì AB
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1960; author reply 1959-60. PubMed ID: 17908612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evisceration vs. enucleation.
    Bernardino CR
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1959; author reply 1959-60. PubMed ID: 17908611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve in bioceramic orbital implants.
    Liao SL; Shih MJ; Lin LL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 139(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Repair of exposed porous polyethylene implants utilizing flaps from the implant capsule.
    Tawfik HA; Budin H; Dutton JJ
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 15745784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study.
    Naik MN; Murthy RK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 18030118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Long-term outcomes of pegged and unpegged bioceramic orbital implants.
    Karslıoğlu S; Buttanrı IB; Fazıl K; Serin D; Akbaba M
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012; 28(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 22785584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Enucleation and evisceration: 20 years of experience.
    Yousuf SJ; Jones LS; Kidwell ED
    Orbit; 2012 Aug; 31(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 22642653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene implant in pediatric patients enucleated for retinoblastoma.
    Marx DP; Vagefi MR; Bearden WH; Anderson RL; Yen MT
    Orbit; 2008; 27(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 19085293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Outcomes and complications of evisceration with primary implant: an electronic medical record driven analytics of 1800 cases.
    Dave TV; Das AV; Mohapatra S; Bansal O; Ganguly A
    Orbit; 2022 Dec; 41(6):717-725. PubMed ID: 34783616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Outcome of eviscerations and enucleations at a Swedish tertiary referral centre between 2008 and 2019: improved surgical management leading to reduced complication rate.
    Svedberg K
    Orbit; 2023 Apr; 42(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 35611572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Double scleral covering evisceration].
    Sanz López A; Sales Sanz M
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 May; 78(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 12789631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration: a prospective study.
    Kaltreider SA; Lucarelli MJ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 18(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 12352819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.