These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18030767)

  • 1. [Assessment of parameters of digital X-ray detectors by the method of exposure of the working area of the detector to uniform X-ray radiation].
    Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2007; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 18030767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of factors affecting the results of estimation of the detective quantum efficiency of digital X-ray detectors within high and low spatial frequency ranges].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2007; (5):6-9. PubMed ID: 18030766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
    Neitzel U
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S227-33; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
    Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
    Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The results of the monitoring of characteristics of digital receivers for X-ray images by using enterprise (VNIIMT) reference standard 01-22-04].
    Blinov NN; Gurzhiev AN; Zelikman MI; Kokuev AN; Kostritskiĭ AV
    Med Tekh; 2004; (6):13-6. PubMed ID: 15656408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experimental and computational evaluation of quality of digital X-ray imaging].
    Zelikman MI; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):14-6. PubMed ID: 17133937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Method to measure spectrum intensity from laser plasma soft X-ray source].
    Ni QL; Gong Y; Chen B; Cao JL
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2004 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15768961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.